| |
| | Extensive Forum Thread on Consensus Decision Making (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22) |
 | | With consensus people may express dissent in discussion, to be sure, but ultimately the aim is that everyone leaves the room thinking that everyone agrees about the deicsion when, in fact, often everyone doesn't agree but, instead, dissenters have simply submerged their dissent because they feel it would be inappropriate to manifest it. |
 | | To me, a consensus approach might actually be a good one to the desk problem, ie, where the person next to you doesn't care, their consensus would probably be easy to obtain, and where they are really offended you probably should remove whatever it is that offends them. |
 | | Advocates of consensus have, wittingly or not, elevated it to some kind of badge of being just, a necessary part of being left, etc. and the result is bad as in the case you describe. |
| www.zmag.org /forums/consenthread.htm (18757 words) |
|