| |
| | An Abstract: "Can consequentialism be reconciled with our common-sense moral intuitions?" (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-07) |
 | | As they see it then, consequentialism can go so far as to accommodate our intuition that it is, for instance, wrong to commit murder even in order to prevent numerous deaths (from say natural causes). |
 | | They assume that consequentialism must necessarily give everyone the same aim, whereas, in order to accommodate I, it would have to give different agents different aims -- it would, for instance, have to give me the aim that I not violate anyone's rights but you the aim that you not violate anyone's rights. |
 | | So, as we have just seen, it is possible for consequentialism to accommodate our intuition that it is wrong to commit a rights violation even in order to prevent a number of others from committing comparable rights violations. |
| www.cofc.edu /~portmord/philstud.htm (990 words) |
|