| |
| | Calgunlaws.com - LAIRD v. TATUM, 408 U.S. 1 (1972) |
 | | Since the Army is sent into territory almost invariably unfamiliar to most soldiers and their commanders, their need for information is likely to be greater than that of the hometown policeman. |
 | | Some of the information came from Army Intelligence agents who attended meetings that were open to the public and who wrote field reports describing the meetings, giving such data as the name of the sponsoring organization, the identity of speakers, the approximate number of persons in attendance, and an indication of whether any disorder occurred. |
 | | Third, the Army's [408 U.S. 1, 27] surveillance was not collecting material in public records but staking out teams of agents, infiltrating undercover agents, creating command posts inside meetings, posing as press photographers and newsmen, posing as TV newsmen, posing as students, and shadowing public figures. |
| www.calgunlaws.com /article-348.html (7729 words) |
|