| |
| | Michael Bader, D.M.H. |
 | | I argue that, in particular, its emphasis on epistemology, its focus on the constructed nature of analytic knowledge and experience, its critique of the positivist tradition of classical psychoanalysis, and its eagerness to remind us of the centrality of ambiguity, doubt, surprise, contingency, and heterogeneity in the analytic situation have increasingly shaped analytic discourse. |
 | | I suggest that this epistemology tends to be left at the door of the consulting room, appears only indirectly in the form of the analyst's increased modesty and willingness to be spontaneous, or else functions as an active hindrance to developing the clinical confidence necessary to maximally move the treatment forward. |
 | | Unfortunately, although modem analysts with a constructivist sensibility have certainly rejected appeals to analytic authority and are more prepared to flexibly attune themselves to the patient's subjectivity, their emphasis on epistemology inadvertently continues this antitherapeutic bias in psychoanalytic theorizing. |
| www.michaelbader.com /article/epistemology.html (12028 words) |
|