| |
| | Morality 2 |
 | | Contractarianism is perhaps the most impressive attempt to refute the AR position; therefore, it is important to consider it in some detail. |
 | | Contractarianism also is unable to adequately account for the rights we give to those unable to form contracts, i.e., infants, children, senile people, mental deficients, and even animals to some extent. |
 | | In summary, contractarianism fails because a) it fails to accurately account for our actual, real-world moral acts and motives, b) it sanctions contractual arrangements that most people would see as unjust, c) it fails to account for the considerations we accord to individuals unable to enter into contracts, and d) it has some impractical consequences. |
| www.animalliberationfront.com /Philosophy/Morality/morality1.htm (3255 words) |
|