| |
| | Books in Review: Against Liberalism |
 | | Kekes concludes Against Liberalism with a suggestion that what is worthwhile in liberalism might best be preserved by a conservative pluralism, one that recognized the incompatibility of human ends, the necessity of difficult trade-offs, and the existence of certain goods—among them, security, civility, and peace—not given much time of day by contemporary liberals. |
 | | But Kekes’ belief in the death of God (he describes it as "the absence of cosmic justice"), along with the unresolved status of human nature in his thought, may prevent him from giving an adequate theoretical treatment to these problems in the future. |
 | | Kekes does not sufficiently stress how the contemporary variant of liberalism is at far remove from the earlier, richer, and more modest liberalism of Montesquieu, Tocqueville, or, in our century, Raymond Aron, Bertrand de Jouvenel, and Isaiah Berlin. |
| www.firstthings.com /ftissues/ft9801/reviews/anderson.html (13790 words) |
|