| |
| | Middle Knowledge, Truthâ“Makers, and the "Grounding Objection" |
 | | Moreover, limiting the truth of such counterfactuals to a moment logically posterior to God's decree appears to make God the author of sin and to obliterate human freedom, since in that case it is God who decrees which counterfactuals about creaturely free acts are true, including counterfactuals concerning sinful human decisions. |
 | | Similarly, when we turn from futureâ“tense propositions to counterfactual propositions and consider Freddoso's proposed truthâ“makers for counterfactuals of creaturely freedom, we see that O'Connor's denial that "there is something 'there "objectively" to be known'"{33} is rooted in the same crude understanding of truthâ“makers already exposed. |
 | | It is the glass's fragility which is the truthâ“maker of the counterfactual at issue, and the causal basis of the disposition is at most responsible, not for the glass's fragility, but for the manifestation of that fragility, that is to say, for the actual shattering of the glass. |
| www.leaderu.com /offices/billcraig/docs/grounding.html (6825 words) |
|