| |
| | Conversation with Niall Ferguson, p. 2 of 6 |
 | | You are associated with a way of thinking about history that has another dimension to it, and it's called "counterfactual history." Tell us what that is, and how it adds another layer, another dimension, to this holistic view. |
 | | Counterfactual history is a mouthful, and rather off-putting, and some people might find a more accessible idea if one said, "It has to do with 'what if' questions: What if the United States had never intervened in the First World War and even the Second World War?" -- just to take a single example. |
 | | Virtual history -- and this is a very, very important point, which isn't understood by many people who dabble in "what if" questions -- is only legitimate if one can show that the alternative that you're discussing, the "what if" scenario you're discussing, was one that contemporaries seriously contemplated. |
| globetrotter.berkeley.edu /people3/Ferguson/ferguson-con2.html (1829 words) |
|