Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Creation science

Related Topics

In the News (Thu 21 Mar 19)

  Creation Science
Welcome to Answers In Creation, a creation science ministry believing in an inerrant Word of God, a literal interpretation of Genesis, and a billions of years old earth.
Creation Science Rebuttals - The Floating Forest Theory Sinks!
Creation Science may be important, but not when compared with your personal walk with Jesus Christ.
www.answersincreation.org   (468 words)

  Creation science - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Creation science is scientific study and investigation of the origins of the universe, the Earth, and life which is based on the perception or belief that the universe and life on Earth were created.
Science is by definition a human effort to understand the universe.
Creation science is limited in scope, focusing on issues relevant to the origin of things.
creationwiki.org /Creation_science   (817 words)

 creationism and creation science
“Creation Science” is an oxymoron since science is concerned only with naturalistic explanations of empirical phenomena and does not concern itself with supernatural explanations of metaphysical phenomena.
Creation scientists are not scientists because they assume that their interpretation of the Bible cannot be in error.
Creation scientists may have failed in their attempts to have evolution banned from the classroom and to have creationism taught alongside evolution.
skepdic.com /creation.html   (4201 words)

  Creation science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Creation Science is distinguished from Neo-Creationism, which is largely associated with the intelligent design movement, in that most advocates of Creation Science accept scripture as a foundation for their claims with their primary goal being to the validation of scripture as historical fact through the use of science.
Creation science advocates argue that mainstream scientific theories of the origins of the universe, the earth, and life are rooted in a priori presumptions of methodological naturalism and uniformitarianism, each of which is disputed.
Creation science's lack of adherence to the standards of the scientific method mean that it (and specifically creation science) cannot be said to be scientific in the way that the term "science" is conventionally understood and utilized.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Creation_science   (3952 words)

 Creation science fair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A creation science fair is a gathering modeled on traditional science fairs which seeks to promote a compatibility of science with religious doctrine, specifically creationism as interpreted within the creation science movement.
Creation science fairs, just like secular science fairs, may or may not require actual empirical studies to be conducted or the scientific method to be observed.
(Creation science fairs should not be conflated with the fairly common didactic practice among various religious schools of simply requiring projects in their science fairs to include a passage from scripture relevant to the subject, but otherwise not promoting or allowing non-mainstream subject matter.)
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Creation_science_fair   (224 words)

 Presenting evidence for the Creation Science Model
Insistence of a natural origin model in spite of the natural properties of molecules, their impossible chance of occurring, thousands of failed attempts to produce life in sophisticated and intelligently designed experiments, and the blatant contradiction to the law of biogenesis is clearly irrational and unscientific.
The creation model offers a consistent and relevant explanation for observed phenomena and predicts that if all organisms were created each as a kind, subject to limited change, then the fossil record should show distinguishable populations of organisms.
Because the creation model predicts fully formed fully functional organisms to be easily distinguished in the fossil record, the creation model both conforms perfectly to the data and is supported by the data.
www.uark.edu /~cdm/creation/presentation.htm   (3790 words)

 THEORY OF EVOLUTION and CREATION SCIENCE   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-07)
That is, it would be impossible for a creation scientist to accept a proof that their beliefs are false and that naturalistic or theistic evolution is true.
That is because their fundamental, foundational belief is that the creation stories in the Book of Genesis are inspired by God and are thus inerrant.
When he created the Appalachian mountains, he chose to formed them to look as if they were the remains of tall mountains which had been eroded for millions of years.
www.religioustolerance.org /ev_over.htm   (2066 words)

Because any intelligible use of the term creation must imply the existence of a creator, and because the creator of all of nature must be, quite literally, super-natural, we see that the fundamental force operating in "creation science" is a super-natural force - which is a polite term for magic.
Science, however, involves the study of natural forces only, and ceases to be science when it attempts to explain phenomena by means of super-natural forces.
This is because evolutionary science is science, and is true in the sense that it is testable and accords with the facts of nature.
www.atheists.org /evolution/creationscience.html   (3155 words)

 Creation Science
"Creation Science", on the other hand, is not falsifiable because the explanation it offers (in essence, "God did it") is not empirically testable, and the "theory" makes no predictions regarding future discoveries that could reasonably be expected if the basic premise is correct.
Additionally, any contradictory evidence creation "scientists" don't disregard entirely, they simply "explain" away as only seeming to be contradictory to those who choose to "deny God." Any alleged problems, they claim, are purely in the eye of the beholder.
"Creation Science" claims that the earth and all life on it were magicked into reality a mere 6,000 to 10,000 years ago by an omnipotent supernatural being for whose very existence there is not the tiniest scrap of objective evidence.
home.neo.rr.com /johnbgood/creation_science.htm   (1635 words)

 Creationism and Creation Science
Some creationists consider the theory of creation described in Genesis to be a scientific account and the Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution to be false.1 These creationists refer to their belief as creation science.
Advocates of creation science have campaigned to have the biblical version of creation taught as a science in U.S. public schools along with the theory of evolution, which they dispute.
Science, says Gould, is "most fun when it plays with interesting ideas, examines their implications, and recognizes that old information may be explained in surprisingly new ways." Thus, through all the debate over evolutionary mechanisms no biologist has been led to doubt that evolution has occurred.
www.clarku.edu /~piltdown/map_intro/creationscience.html   (1368 words)

 Biblical Creation
Creation As Science develops a biblical creation model and compares the predictions of this model compared to a naturalistic model, young earth creationism, and theistic evolution.
This biblical creation model is divided into four main areas, the origin of the universe, the origin of the Solar System, the history of life on earth, and the origin and history of mankind.
Peril in Paradise: Theology, Science, and the Age of the Earth by Mark S. Whorton, Ph.D. goes beyond the superficial doctrines espoused by the young earth "perfect paradise" paradigm to examine underlying assumptions and extrabiblical teachings of the movement.
www.godandscience.org /apologetics/creation.php   (1539 words)

 Creation Science
An Atheist Because of Science: Many today are atheists because they have been taught the science proves there is no God.
Cambrian Explosion Disproves Evolution: One of the most remarkable pieces of evidence disproving evolution is the “Cambrian Explosion” Most textbooks never mention it, and the ones that do relegate it to a short phrase or paragraph as if it is some insignificant detail.
Global Flood on Mars but Not on Earth: One of the most amazing admissions of inconsistency in secular science is this issue of a global flood on Mars.
www.learnthebible.org /creation_science_main.htm   (726 words)

 "Creation science" is science.   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-07)
Furthermore, creation scientists have yet to offer any scientific evidence that proves the case of creationism; their efforts are almost entirely spent critiquing apparent contradictions within evolution.
By presenting the creation model as science, creationists have re-raised the question of what "science" is. Philosophers of science have worked out a commonly accepted list of criteria (produced well outside the debate between creationists and evolutionists).
To be accepted as science, a theory must have predictive value, must be coherent (or internally consistent), must be falsifiable (or verifiable), and must explain at least those phenomena explained by the current theory.
www.huppi.com /kangaroo/L-creationscience.htm   (1035 words)

 Creation Science FAQ
Creation is NOT "anti-science", furthermore 99% of the research by evolutionists has nothing directly to do with evolution even if you do see the word bandied about in their journals, papers, and magazines.
Scientific creation is the theory which proceeds from the claim that it is possible to employ the results of natural science to demonstrate that the universe and all life was created in a mature and fully functioning form; that the concept of intelligent design can be validated by the results of scientific investigation.
Microevolution is an important part of the creation model, it is the mechanism by which created kinds have been able to fill the earth and adapt to all of its various ecological and climatological conditions.
mysite.verizon.net /vzephl0d   (13977 words)

 Creation Science   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-07)
Creation Science is the practice of science with the assumption and acknowledgment that there is a creator God.
Since no scientist was present to observe either the creation of any star or any species, and since no one can replicate the conditions when life or planets began, reputable investigators are left to interpret the data.
The "days of creation" referred to in II Peter and in Psalms were literal and did not span eons of time.
www.straight-talk.net /evolution/creationscience.shtml   (1716 words)

 ”It’s not science”
But in the same paragraph they claim, ‘scientists have carefully examined the claims of creation science, and found that ideas such as the young Earth and global Flood are incompatible with the evidence.’ But obviously creation cannot have been examined (tested!) and found to be false if it’s ‘untestable’.
Of course the founders of modern science were not materialists (Newton, widely considered the greatest scientist ever, is a prime example) and they did not see their science as somehow excluding a creator, or even making the Creator redundant.
Michael Ruse, the Canadian philosopher of science also made the strong point that the issue is not whether evolution is science and creation is religion, because such a distinction is not really valid.
www.answersingenesis.org /docs2002/0228not_science.asp   (2529 words)

 Creation Science Book Reviews
This book is a look, from a young earth creation science perspective, at all the references to creation throughout the Bible.
There is no conflict between science and the Bible...all one needs is a proper understanding how to merge science and the Bible.
Our goal is to provide rebuttals to the bad science behind young earth creationism, and honor God by properly presenting His creation.
www.answersincreation.org /bookreview.htm   (914 words)

 Creation Science Evangelism - Creation, Evolution, Dinosaurs, and the Bible.
Creation Science Evangelism - Creation, Evolution, Dinosaurs, and the Bible.
Creation Science Evangelism was started in 1989 by Dr. Kent Hovind.
Kent Hovind is one of the most requested speakers on the Creation and Evolution topic in churches and Universities all over the world.
www.drdino.com   (237 words)

 Main Page - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Although many people argue that the days of the creation week should not be taken literally, the events are described in terms that are correlated with definitions of time.
Protesters, Visitors Flock To the Newly Opened Creation Museum As the Creation Museum's doors opened, about 100 protesters were outside the front gates; and the line for people entering the building was between 500 and 600, with the line running around the building.
Creation Museum growing With large crowds expected, Answers in Genesis is adding an extra 10,000 square feet for their museum.
creationwiki.org /Main_Page   (2172 words)

 Creation Truth Ministries
Creation Truth Ministries is dedicated to defending the authority of the Bible starting in Genesis.
Creation Truth Ministries is a Christian ministry that seeks to enable believers to defend their faith in an increasingly secular age.
You could be instrumental in getting the truth of Creation into your church, camp or Christian school, in order to build the faith of brothers and sisters in Christ, enable Christians to defend their faith, and see unbelievers come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ.
www.creationtruthministries.org /index.html   (731 words)

 Creation Science FAQ
Scientific creationism is the theory which proceeds from the claim that it is possible to employ the results of natural science to demonstrate that the universe and all life was created in a mature and fully functioning form; that the concept of intelligent design can be validated by the results of scientific investigation.
Microevolution is an important part of the creation model, it is the mechanism by which created kinds have been able to fill the earth and adapt to all of its various ecological and climatological conditions.
At the time of its creation, each kind was created with sufficient genetic potential, or gene pool, to give rise to nearly all the varieties within that kind that have existed in the past and those that are yet in existence today.
www.clubs.psu.edu /up/origins/faqsci.htm   (13036 words)

 IBSS - The Bible and Science - The Creation Controversy
The Institute for Creation Research (ICR) headed by Henry Morris is the leader of the young-earth creationists.
He takes the Bible literally with creation around 6,000 years ago with no gaps in the genealogy of Genesis, and throws science out when it disagrees with the Bible instead of trying to harmonize them.
The stated purpose of the ASA is "to investigate any area relating Christian faith and science" and "to make known the results of such investigations for comment and criticism by the Christian community and by the scientific community." There Website is at www.asa3.org.
www.bibleandscience.com /science/creation.htm   (2087 words)

 Creation Science Fellowship of New Mexico -- HomePage   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-07)
The Creation Science Fellowship of New Mexico (CSFNM) is a Christian Fellowship of scientists and laypeople devoted to understanding and explaining origins as revealed by scientific discovery and Biblical truth.
Creation Science Fellowship meetings are free & open to the public.
The account of the special creation of Adam and Eve as one man and one woman, and their subsequent fall into sin, is the basis for our belief in the necessity of a Savior for all people.
www.swcp.com /creation   (558 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.