| |
| | Against Ctesiphon; Or, On the Crown by Aeschines. Greece (432 B.C.-324 B.C.). Vol. I. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. ... |
 | | Thus, when their conduct came to a formal examination, their accusers were involved in great perplexity, their judges in still greater; for many of the persons thus subject to examination, tho convicted on the clearest evidence of having defrauded the public, were yet suffered to escape from justice; and no wonder. |
 | | Yes; but you will hear it argued in answer, that to this office of inspector of the works he was not appointed in the general assembly either by lot or suffrage. |
 | | Say then, Ctesiphon, when the most heinous instances of this mans baseness are so incontestably evident that his accuser exposes himself to the censure, not of advancing falsehoods, but of recurring to facts so long acknowledged and notorious, is he to be publicly honored, or to be branded with infamy? |
| www.bartleby.com /268/1/19.html (6923 words) |
|