| |
| | Arif Dirlih, The Origins of |
 | | The May Fourth Movement was, of course, a `Cultural Revolution', and whilst noting that Meisner sees `populism' as a salient feature of Chinese `Marxism' from Li Dazhao to Mao, the writer drops the significant hint that `some have blamed the "Anti Party" activities of the Cultural Revolution upon Anarchism' (p271). |
 | | Having awakened Chinese Marxism, the Comintern, first of all of Zinoviev, and then of Stalin, stifled it, and a real examination of China in the light of a critical analysis had to wait until after the defeat of 1927, when it was too late to have a positive effect. |
 | | As opposed to the first healthy instincts of the founders of Chinese Marxism, `decisions concerning the revolution were made for them by others, who claimed political superiority because they commanded theoretical superiority' (p98), leading to `rocky relations' (p197) and mutual mistrust (p267). |
| www.revolutionary-history.co.uk /backiss/Vol2/No4/China.html (1309 words) |
|