| |
| | CCL.NET 2002.10.31-005 |
 | | You could check the definition of 'cutoff wavelength' to see whether it means 0.1%, 1% or 10% of full intensity, etc. Generally, data collected below the solvent cutoff would be considered unreliable. |
 | | The problem is that as you get beyond the cutoff wavelength, you still aren't going to get enough light through the blank to allow for a really proper correction. |
 | | Generally, one doesn't scan beyond the cutoffs of the equipment, whether this is the cufoff of the optics, the glassware (quartz in your case, I suspect, but Pyrex will do for > 290 or so), or the solvent. |
| www.ccl.net /cgi-bin/ccl/message.cgi?2002+10+31+005 (808 words) |
|