| |
| | DLJ Long Term Investment Corporation v BargainDomainNames.com - Case No. 104580 |
 | | The Complainant avers that, as a result of DLJ’s widespread, long-time, continuous, and prominent use, the DLJ mark has acquired significant goodwill, wide public recognition, and fame as a means by which DLJ and its services are known to the public and their source and origin are identified. |
 | | Complainant contends that Respondent’s domain name is identical to and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s DLJ mark in the financial services field, and consists entirely of Complainant’s DLJ mark, so that Respondent has created a likelihood of confusion as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of Respondent’s website. |
 | | Respondent does not use the DLJ mark anywhere on its website, and therefore, is not commonly known by the domain name pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(ii). |
| www.arb-forum.com /domains/decisions/104580.htm (1310 words) |
|