| |
| | Dalton v. Camp, 353 NC 647 (495PA99-2) 07/20/2001 |
 | | In the wake of Camp's resignation, Dalton sued Camp, Menius, and MCC for breach of the fiduciary duty of loyalty, conspiracy to appropriate customers, tortious interference with contract, interference with prospective advantage, and unfair and deceptive acts or practices under chapter 75 of the North Carolina General Statutes. |
 | | As for Dalton's claim of tortious interference with prospective advantage, the Court of Appeals again held that summary judgment was properly granted for defendant Menius and improperly granted for defendant Camp. |
 | | Camp's duties as a productionmanager for Dalton were limited to those commonly associated with any employee. |
| www.aoc.state.nc.us /www/public/sc/opinions/2001/495-99-2.htm (3493 words) |
|