| |
| | Boston Review:Orr Reviews "Darwin's Dangerous Idea" by Daniel Dennett (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-30) |
 | | Halfway through his book, Dennett confides that the "prospects for elaborating a rigorous science of memetics are doubtful." But he assures us that, "[w]hether or not the meme perspective can be turned into science, in its philosophical guise it has already done more good than harm." I confess that I am astonished by this move. |
 | | Dennett explains that a "vivid way of posing the question is to imagine becoming an artificial selector of altruistic people" (his emphasis). |
 | | Dennett, ever optimistic, triumphantly concludes that "[t]here is no denying, at this point, that Darwin's idea is a universal solvent, capable of cutting right to the heart of everything in sight." Drawing his argument to a close, he quotes, with some approval, Nietzsche's bleak vision of a Nature ruled by an apathetic but omnipresent Darwinism: |
| www.bostonreview.net /br21.3/Orr.html#1 (5612 words) |
|