Day-Age Creationism - Factbites
 Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Day-Age Creationism


    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.


Related Topics

In the News (Mon 28 Dec 09)

  
 Learn more about Creationism in the online encyclopedia.
Day-Age Creationism holds that the six days referred to are not ordinary 24-hour days, but rather much longer periods (of thousands or millions of years); the Genesis account is then interpreted as an account of the process of evolution.
Day-Age Creationism holds that the "six days" of Genesis are not ordinary 24-hour days, but rather much longer periods (for instance, each "day" could be the equivalent of a million years of modern time).
Young Earth Creationism is typically based on Jewish and Christian religious fundamentalism and holds that scientific findings simply conflict with the account of creation given in Genesis, where it is recorded that the Earth was created by God in six days.
www.onlineencyclopedia.org /c/cr/creationism.html   (6781 words)

  
 Facts about topic: (Day-Age Creationism)
Day-age creationism suggests that the very brief account of creation in Genesis was not intended as informative, but rather as a succinct summary of ancient knowledge in the Levant (The former name for the geographical area of the eastern Mediterranean that is now occupied by Lebanon and Syria and Israel).
That said, Day-Age Creationism does include a number of specific and interesting theories and speculation regarding divine creation of the universe which is ultimately unknown to man. These ideas revolve around the use of the word "day" in contexts before the existence of the sun, moon, and earthly time in the book of Genesis.
The word "day" that's used here in reference to the period of all the creative days together is the same Hebrew word (yôm) used for each of the six creative days in chapter one.
www.absoluteastronomy.com /encyclopedia/d/da/day-age_creationism1.htm   (1295 words)

  
 Old Earth creationism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
More commonly, advocates of an old Earth hold that the six days referred to are not ordinary 24-hour days, but rather the Hebrew word for "day" (yom) can be interpreted in this context to mean a long period of time (thousands or millions of years) rather than a 24-hour day.
Old Earth creationism is a variant of the creationist view of the origin of the universe and life on Earth.
Progressive Creationism is the idea that God allows certain natural process to affect creation but has also intervened at key moments in life’s history to guide those processes or, in some views, create new species all together (often to replenish the earth).
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Old_Earth_Creationism   (1317 words)

  
 What is Creationism?
Day-Age Creationism was more popular than Gap Creationism in the 19th and and early 20th centuries.
Part 1 of this article examines varieties of Christian Creationism, because Christianity in its various forms is by far the most prevalent religion in the United States.
(Creationism in any form is a relatively minor force in other parts of the world.) Since creationism grades gradually into evolution, part 1 also considers evolutionary beliefs.
www.talkorigins.org /faqs/wic.html   (3319 words)

  
 NCSE Resource
There is not one creationism, but many varieties, ranging from strict Biblical literalist young-earth creationism, through a variety of old-earth creationisms ("Gap Creation;" "Day-Age Creationism"), to progressive creationism, to continuous creationism, to theistic evolutionism.
Among them, "Gap creationism" allows for there to have been a long period of time before the six days of creation described in Genesis (Numbers, 1992), or alternately for the six days in Genesis to be separated by thousands or hundreds of thousands of years of time.
Creationism differs in some important ways: supporters are science fans, not detractors, and they believe science is useful, important, and something that students should be exposed to.
www.ncseweb.org /resources/articles/5200_creationism_ideology_and_sci_6_24_1996.asp   (7581 words)

  
 Age of the Earth & Universe - ChristianAnswers.Net
Most Christians have heard the argument that the word "day" in Genesis does not mean a literal 24 hour type day, but rather that the "days" represent 6 great ages of time.
The "days" in Genesis 1 are always specifically used in connection with the words "evening and morning." This phrase is used with "day" 38 times in the Old Testament, not counting Genesis chapter 1.
When the word "day" is used with a number, such as day one, day two, etc., it always refers to a literal, 24 hour type day.
www.christiananswers.net /q-eden/edn-c002.html   (689 words)

  
 Creationism and teaching evolution
U.S. District Court determined that "creation science" (or "creationism") is a religious belief that, within the context of purportedly providing "balance" in science instruction where the theory of evolution is taught, serves no secular purpose except to advance a peculiar religious belief.
Creationism is a legitimate topic for religion, history, literature or philosophy class -- not science.
"Creationism" refers to a wide range of beliefs and all cultures have some sort of supernatural explanation for the diversity of life on earth.
arnica.csustan.edu /evolution/lectures/creationism_and_teaching_evoluti.htm   (1568 words)

  
 Creationism - EvoWiki
Day-age creationism - Interpret the the 7 "days" of creation in genesis as a methaphor for the development of earth over ~4.6by.
Gap creationism - Believe there is a large gap between genesis 1:1 and genesis 1:2, accounting for the age of the Earth.
Creationism is a broad category, and specific forms of creationism vary considerably.
wiki.cotch.net /wiki.phtml?title=Creationist   (624 words)

  
 Howstuffworks "How Creationism Works"
Day-age creationists view each "day" of creation as a period of millions or billions of years, accounting for the scientifically determined age of the Earth within the framework of the Bible.
Theistic evolutionism is also called "evolutionary creationism," but since it does not involve a literal reading of the Bible, and because many theistic evolutionists fall on the side of evolution in the creationism vs. evolution debate, many people view it as separate from creationism.
Some tenets of creationism are not at all compatible with the findings of modern science, while others allow for a reinterpretation of the Bible in view of what some perceive as scientific proof.
people.howstuffworks.com /creationism4.htm   (551 words)

  
 Welcome to Creationism’s Young-Age Universe
Creationism’s young-age universe, given by the Bible account, is the fact.
It is the age of disbelief and the culture of death.
The geological theory of age and the theory of relativity coincide with Hinduism’s reincarnation cycles of death and rebirth, and the astronomical ages of the Hindu myths of creation.
www.geocities.com /kangroog/youngearth3.htm   (1081 words)

  
 Christian Views of Science and Earth History
The second position, progressive creationism or day-age creationism, holds that the earth and the universe are billions of years old.
The issue of the age of the earth is very controversial among evangelicals, particularly those who have chosen some field of science as their career.
For instance if the days of Genesis are millions of years long, then when flowers were created on day three, it would be millions of years before pollinators, such as bees, were created on days five and six.
www.leaderu.com /orgs/probe/docs/viewscie.html   (3207 words)

  
 Theistic Evolution and the Day-Age Theory
The Hebrew word for day is yom, and, we are reminded, it is used in a variety of ways: (1) the daylight period in the diurnal cycle as in Genesis 1:5, 14, 16, 18; (2) a normal 24-hour period; and (3) an indefinite time period as in Psalm 90:10.
It is sometimes claimed that the church fathers believed in long ages for the days in Genesis 1.
In that case, day one is the first thousand years of earth's history, day two the second thousand years, etc. Consistency would logically dictate that each of the six periods be the same length, resulting in a 6000-year period of creation from nothing to Adam.
icr.cybrhost.com /pubs/imp/imp-081.htm   (4090 words)

  
 CH050 - CreationWiki
"Gap creationism", day-age creationism, and other attempted "reconciliations" were attempts to reconcile the Bible with the new uniformitarian paradigm, not with the evidence itself.
Young-earth creationism failed early on, so scientists tried gap creationism, day-age creationism, and other attempted reconciliations.
Young-earth creationism didn't fail, it was replaced by the assumption of uniformitarianism.
www.nwcreation.net /wiki/index.php?title=CH050   (830 words)

  
 Is Compromise Possible Between Evolution and Creation?
The booklet accepts the geological ages and much of evolution, but argues that the process was designed by God, advocating progressive creationism and/or theistic evolutionism as a compromise approach that should satisfy both creationists and evolutionists.
The Basic conflict of the ages is between the two world views of evolutionism versus creationism.
By "literalism," Young means taking the six days of creation as literal days and the flood as worldwide in geological effects, the position advocated by most scientific creationists.
icr.cybrhost.com /pubs/imp/imp-177.htm   (1598 words)

  
 Day Definition / Day Research
Different definitions of the day are based on the apparent motion of the SunThe Sun (occasionally referred to as Sol) is the star at the center of our solar system.
Day is a Time to Tell the Truth About Jobs.
[click for more] or to the full day covering a dark and a light period.
www.elresearch.com /Day   (693 words)

  
 Fred's Bible Talk - Refuting Compromise
In addition, Dr. Ross is careless with his use of these individuals, because they did not fully support a belief in long ages as he articulates “long ages.”  Augustine, for instance, believed the 6 days of creation were instantaneous with all of the days happening in a moment.
day, and that the fossil record is the product of millions, upon millions of years of life forms dying, and not the result of one catastrophic, global flood as the Bible records in Genesis 7-8.
With trained scientists and theologians behind him, Dr. Ross and his apologetics for progressive creationism appears to be a sheer, impenetrable wall of defense.
www.fredsbibletalk.com /refuting.html   (5195 words)

  
 Apologetics Press - Popular Compromises of Creation—The Day-Age Theory
The days of creation should be accepted as literal, 24-hour periods because whenever the Hebrew word yom occurs in the plural (yamim) in Old Testament non-prophetical literature (viz., the same kind of literature found in Genesis 1), it always carries the meaning of a normal day.
The days of creation should be accepted as literal, 24-hour periods because whenever the Hebrew word yom is modified by the phrase “evening and morning” in Old Testament non-prophetical literature (viz., the same kind of literature found in Genesis 1), it always carries the meaning of a normal day.
The days of creation should be accepted as literal, 24-hour periods because whenever the Hebrew word yom is preceded by a numeral in Old Testament non-prophetical literature (viz., the same kind of literature found in Genesis 1), it always carries the meaning of a normal day.
www.apologeticspress.org /articles/301   (3647 words)

  
 Gerald Schroeder - Articles - The Age of the Universe
In the Midrash (Vayikra Rabba 29:1), an expansion of the Talmud, all the Sages agree that Rosh Hashana commemorates the soul of Adam, and that the Six Days of Genesis are separate.
So when the Sages excluded these six days from the calendar, and said that the entire text is parable, it wasn't because they were trying to apologize away what they'd seen in the local museum.
The ancient commentaries found in the Talmud, Rashi, and the Kaballah all insist that the six days of Genesis, that is, the time prior to Adam, are in fact 24 hour days, BUT contain all the ages of the world.
www.geraldschroeder.com /age.html   (5474 words)

  
 What is Creationism
The age of the Earth: the radiometric evidence from the USGS
Their age is estimated to be between 500,000 and 300,000 years old.
Lecure notes on creationism from Dr. Cameron's course at the University of Colorado
users.tamuk.edu /kfjab02/Biology/EVOLUTION/b4355ce_week1.htm   (1077 words)

  
 Podiatry Arena - Evolution
Day-age creationists interpret each day of creation as a long period of time, even thousands or millions of years.
If we believe in evolutionary progress (as opposed to creationism), then by 1.6 million years ago the limbs of successful hominids would already be pretty good in terms of ambulation and grasping/and throwing objects.
In an era of being on your feet for most of the day, and lugging possessions and dependants, a long run would be the last thing you would do IMO.
www.podiatry-arena.com /podiatry-forum/printthread.php?t=588   (4487 words)

  
 Open Directory - Society: Religion and Spirituality: Christianity: Perspectives: Origins and Creation: Old Earth Views
Day-Age Creationism - This view holds that the six days referred to in the Genesis are not ordinary 24-hour days, but rather are much longer periods of thousands or millions of years.
Age Evidences - Online book by Hill Roberts regarding evidences that have led many scientists to accept an ancient date for creation of the earth and universe.
Christian Geology: KJV Bible and Gap Theory of Creationism - Rightly-Dividing Geology and Genesis Beyond The Gap Theory of Christian Creationism using the King James Bible.
dmoz.org /Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Christianity/Perspectives/Origins_and_Creation/Old_Earth_Views   (440 words)

  
 David Raikow Speaks
I see three classes of alternatives: 1) the continuum of belief from flat-earth creationism, young-earth, day-age, ID, Theistic evolutionism, material evolutionism, etc. (ala E. Scott); 2) the myriad of other religious creation stories (e.g.
Because their detractors have presumed to blur the distinction between ID and creationism, some ID proponents have seen fit to issue statements to clarify the matter.
You have already written as if you were quite knowledgeable concerning the subject of creationism, yet only now are you asking about the creationary analysis of empirical data.
www.trueorigin.org /raikow01.asp   (1177 words)

  
 Blogger: Email Post to a Friend
There are, in fact, at least 10 different creationisms, as outlined in Eugenie Scott’s brilliant heuristic.
I noted that Hovind would have to defend his creationism not just against evolution, but against all the other creationisms, including Ken Ham’s Answers in Genesis, who have publicly disputed many of Hovind’s arguments.
Then I got serious, explaining that there is no such thing as the creationist position to debate.
www.blogger.com /email-post.g?blogID=6936294&postID=108440264258007638   (127 words)

  
 North Carolina Scientists Speak Out on Evolution
Day-age Creationism and Gap Theory Creationism, both of which can be viewed as "Old-earth Creationism," attempt to reconcile the Biblical account of creation with scientific evidence for the great age of the universe and the earth.
Day-Age Creationism holds that the six days of creation as described in Genesis were considerably longer than 24 hours.
Young-earth Flood Creationism holds that the earth was created less than 10,000 years ago, that life forms were created during creation week as described in Genesis, that the flood eliminated life forms that were not taken aboard Noah’s ark, and that all terrestrial life forms today are progeny of passengers on the ark.
www2.ncsu.edu:8010 /ncas/evolution   (17473 words)

  
 Ekklesia discussion: The Day-Age Interpretation of Genesis
I’m afraid that since current day in vogue evolutionary science tells us that the earth is 4.6 billion years old, we Christians don’t want to be thought fools to go against this “established scientific fact” so we try and see if we can fit this piece of scientific “truth” into the Bible.
And sure enough, since day can be translated as a long period of time, we immediately jump to the conclusion that Moses must be referring to long periods of time here.
The appearance of "day" and "night", therefore can be said to have happened after the creation of the sun.
www.ekklesia.co.uk /cgi-bin/discus/show.cgi?tpc=2&post=4326   (5459 words)

  
 CA510: Two models.
Biblical creationism alone includes geocentrism, young-earth creationism, day-age creationism, progressive creationism, intelligent design creationism, and more.
www.talkorigins.org /indexcc/CA/CA510.html   (119 words)

  
 Shop Reasons To Believe - VALUE PACKS
These lively discussions with members from the Reasons To Believe scholar team give you biblically based answers to some of the toughest questions about day-age creationism.
In this complementary two-book set, author Terrence Dickinson examines the heavens by day and by night.
Exploring the Night Sky, Exploring the Sky by Day (2 Book Set) [S0105]
www.reasons.org /shop/customer/home.php?cat=19&js=n   (584 words)

  
 Table of contents for The counter-creationism handbook
Day-Age Creationism Genesis 1 order of events, CH801.
Young Earth Creationism Age of the Universe Universe 6000-10000 years old, CH200.
Miscellaneous Young Earth Creationism (see also CC100: Human fossils out of place; CB930.3: Dinosaurs in the Congo.) Man and dinosaurs coexisted, CH710.
www.loc.gov /catdir/toc/ecip058/2005003394.html   (1053 words)

  
 EPM Resources - Evolution/Creation
What is your opinion on Day Age Creationism?
Creation vs. Evolution- A Closer Look at the Evidence by Jim Darnall, EPM Volunteer
Site designed and maintained by Kenny Kim Design
www.epm.org /resources-evolution_creation.html   (115 words)

  
 NCSE Resource
PROGRESSIVE CREATIONISM Although some modern activist antievolutionists may still hold to Day-Age and Gap views, the view held by the majority of today's Old Earth Creationists (OECs) is some form of Progressive Creationism (PC).
DAY-AGE THEORY Another attempt to accommodate science to a literal, or mostly literal reading, of the Bible is the Day-Age theory, which was more popular than the Gap Theory in the nineteenth and the earlier part of the twentieth century (Young 1958:57).
Progressive Creationists, such as Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe ministries, have no problems with scientific data concerning the age of the earth or the long period of time it has taken for the Earth to come to its current form.
www.ncseweb.org /resources/articles/4506_antievolutionism_and_creationi_2_13_2001.asp   (115 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.