Where results make sense

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us

Dead man statute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A dead man statute is a statute designed to prevent perjury in a civil case by prohibiting a witness who is an interested party from testifying about communications or transactions with a decedent, unless there is a waiver. This prohibition only applies against a witness who has an interest in the outcome of the case, and only applies where that witness is testifying for his own interests, and against the interests of the decedent. There is no federal law imposing such a restriction, but about half of the U.S. States have enacted a dead man statute. en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Dead_man_statute   (182 words)

[No title] The import of this requirement is that, strategically, a party faced with the possible application of the statute should through his or her case-in-chief provide either sufficient corroboration or provide testimony from an interested party to invoke the exception to the application of the statute. Corroboration for purposes of the dead man's statute requires testimony or other evidence that tends to support some issue or allegation advanced by the party able to testify which is essential to sustain a judgment in such party's favor. Another exception to the application of the statute is where an adverse party is called by the representative of the incapacitated party and testifies regarding the facts in dispute and that testimony is uncontradicted and not inherently improbable. www.courts.state.va.us /txtops/1020476.txt   (2643 words)

No. 03CA0218 In the Matter of the Estate of Crenshaw v. Bussey. - August 26, 2004 - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinions The trial court concluded as a matter of law that the Colorado dead man’s statute did not exclude testimony by Beryl I. Bussey, who asserted a right to be the personal representative of the estate of Theodore Crenshaw by virtue of her purported common law marriage to him. The dead man’s statute has been construed as providing protection for the benefit of an estate; consequently, where the result of a proceeding can neither increase nor diminish the estate, the statute is inapplicable. We are also mindful that dead man’s statutes were created as exceptions to a broad common law rule that disqualified interested parties from testifying in their own favor. www.cobar.org /opinions/opinion.cfm?OpinionID=4761   (1467 words)

August 26, 2004 - Colorado Court of Appeals Opinions The trial court concluded as a matter of law that the Colorado dead man’s statute did not exclude testimony by Bussey, who asserted a right to be the personal representative of the estate of Crenshaw, by virtue of her purported common law marriage to decedent. The dead man’s statute disallows testimony by any witness concerning transactions or conversations with a decedent where the witness has an interest adverse to the estate. The Court of Appeals holds that the unambiguous language of the statute means that once claimant used sick leave for part of the time he was on limited duty, any administrative charge employer made for that sick leave may not be rescinded and the statutory credit recaptured by employer’s reinstatement of that benefit. www.cobar.org /opinions/opinionlist.cfm?CaseDate=8/26/2004&CourtID=1   (2019 words)

Williamson & Lavecchia LC www.wllc.com   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-12) dead man's statute does not require corroboration of a party's testimony regarding certain facts if another interested party testified to a version of the facts on behalf of the decedent. Johnson correctly asserts that the dead man's statute applies to this testimony because it was given by an adverse party and involved an essential element of Dr. Raviotta's claim that the care he provided to Ms. Bell on November 15, that such testimony, as a matter of law, was not corroborated as required by that statute, that the trial court erred in submitting that testimony and the issue of corroboration of such testimony to the jury, and that such error was not harmless. www.wllc.com /Library/ACF9E95.htm   (3352 words)

No. 99-1810 The supreme court stated "[t]he dead man's statute renders a witness incompetent to testify on transactions or conversations with a deceased only when the witness is a party, or is a person from, through or under whom a party derives his interest...." Id. The court concluded that the testimony was not precluded by the dead man's statute because "Theiler was neither a party nor a person from, through or under whom his wife (a party) derived her interest." Id. Despite the fact that the dead man's statute is often narrowly construed, we know of no cases, and the parties have not called our attention to any, in which a party who would gain by the direct effect of the judgment was allowed to testify to a conversation with a deceased. www.wisbar.org /res/capp/z1999/99-1810.htm   (4789 words)

[No title] The issue presented in this case is whether the West Virginia Dead Man's Statute prohibits the admission of an interested party's observations and opinions regarding the mental competency and capacity of a deceased. Thus, the premise of the statutes is "that there is a very strong temptation to lie or to conceal material facts to the detriment of the decedent's representative(s)." 182 W. Va. at 326 n.6, 387 S.E.2d at 561 n.6, citing Franklin D. Cleckley, Handbook on Evidence for West Virginia Lawyers 2.2(D)(1) at 40-41 (2nd ed. As we construe the statute, the circuit court committed error by barring the testimony of the plaintiff as to her mental or physical observations and descriptions of the deceased which antedated and post-dated the execution of the will. www.state.wv.us /WVSCA/docs/spring96/22812.htm   (3992 words)

Converted WP file 21267 The Dead Man's Statute does not preclude the beneficiaries of the decedent's estate from testifying and if they testify as to the decedent's transaction, then there is a waiver of the statutory bar as to the other side. The Dead Man's Statute is a rule that prohibits a survivor in a transaction with a dead person to testify because the lips of the decedent are sealed and there is too great a danger that interested survivors will take advantage of the decedent's estate. We have recognized, however, that the Dead Man's Statute does not preclude the beneficiaries of the decedent's estate from testifying and if they testify as to the decedent's transaction, then there is a waiver of the statutory bar as to the other side. www.state.wv.us /wvsca/docs/fall93/21267.htm   (2209 words)

No. 01-2533 According to Jameson, the purpose of the statute is to protect persons with interests opposed to the person who has transacted or communicated with the deceased party, not to protect the person with the opportunity to misrepresent that communication or transaction. Although the wording of the statute is cumbersome, the core meaning is that it disqualifies a witness to a transaction or communication with a decedent from testifying about that transaction or communication in his or her favor, or in the favor of any party to the case claiming under the witness. Menning, 72 Wis. 2d 8, 12-13, 239 N.W.2d 528 (1976), was whether the statute barred the testimony of the spouse of a witness who was incompetent to testify under the statute, and the court concluded it did not, because the spouse's interest, dependent upon the laws of intestacy and election, was too remote and uncertain. www.wisbar.org /res/capp/2002/01-2533.htm   (6052 words)

Washington Courts   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-12) Because the 'dead man statute' does not prevent the plaintiffs from presenting their case, because genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment regarding when the statute of limitations commenced to run, and because genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment regarding the merits of the lawsuit, we reverse and remand for trial. The purpose of the dead man statute is to prevent interested parties from giving self-serving testimony regarding conversations and transactions with the deceased because the dead cannot respond to unfavorable testimony. The protections of the statute may be waived by an adverse party by (a) failure to object, (b) cross-examination which is not within the scope of direct examination, or (c) testimony favorable to the estate about transactions or communications with the decedent. www.courts.wa.gov /opinions?fa=opinions.opindisp&docid=516680MAJ   (2669 words)

Deadman's Statute These statutes were created in about half of the States during the early years of the 20th Century, but they have proven unnecessary and problematic, and most states that created such laws have abolished them decades ago. Discovery had not been invented in 1919 when the Virginia statute was cast in essentially its current form, and thus could not have been considered in assessing the protections needed in the courts of the Commonwealth to deal with the risk of perjury by a party. The intention of the present revision is to clarify that the statute is not applicable if an interested witness testifies for the decedent/disabled person, and to make no change in the existing body of law defining the forms of pecuniary interest that render a witness an "interested witness" for purposes of the deadman's section. www.vba.org /section/civil/deadmanrept.htm   (7416 words)

[No title] The Dead Man’s Statute Under section 13-90-101, 5 C.R.S. (1999), all persons with an interest in a cause of action are presumed competent to testify. The policy underlying the Dead Man’s Statute is to guard against perjury by living interested witnesses when deceased persons cannot refute the testimony, thus protecting estates against unjust claims. The Dead Man’s Statute states: No party to any civil action, suit, or proceeding or person directly interested in the event thereof shall be allowed to testify therein of such person's own motion or in such person’s own behalf. www.courts.state.co.us /supct/opinions/1998/98SC570.doc   (4357 words)

Evans v Evans' second point of error contends the trial court erred in admitting the decedent's will to probate because the evidence of nonrevocation violated the Dead Man's Statute and was self-serving, unverified, and unauthenticated. The Dead Man's Statute prohibits admission of a decedent's words or actions through a third party who could benefit. As for inadmissibility pursuant to the Dead Man's Statute, no such objection was made at trial. www.danpinello.com /May.htm   (876 words)

69 Wn.2d 422, ARTHUR E. MALACKY, et al., Appellants, V. MATA R. SCHEPPLER, Respondent The dead man's statute (RCW 5.60.030) does not seek to prevent, nor does it prohibit, an interested witness from testifying on behalf, or in favor of, the estate of a deceased or insane person. The recitals of consideration cannot be contradicted by oral evidence, for the parol evidence rule and RCW 5.60.030 (the dead man's statute) would be violated. Second, the statute does not seek to prevent, nor does it prohibit, an interested witness from testifying on behalf, or in favor, of the estate of a deceased or insane person. www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/supreme/069wn2d/069wn2d0422.htm   (1481 words)

FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code At the trial the artist's estate sought initially to prevent the plaintiff purchaser from testifying with respect to two meetings she allegedly had with Basquiat, on the grounds that such evidence was barred by the New York Dead Man's Statute, N.Y. CPLR 4519 (McKinney 1992). Although plaintiff concedes the statute applies, she nonetheless insists that the introduction of her former testimony was not reversible error, for three different reasons -- (A) the hearsay exception in Rule 804, (B) waiver, and (C) harmless error. New York's Dead Man's Statute is a rule of witness competency, not a rule of privilege. caselaw.lp.findlaw.com /cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=2nd&navby=case&no=957329   (4859 words)

Dead Man's Statute Law and Legal Definition - USlegalforms.com   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-12) A Dead Man's Statute is a state law, that varies by state, prohibiting testimony from an interested witness in respect to conversations or transactions with the deceased. Such statutes aim to prevent false testimony from witnesses that is unable to be refuted by the deceased or an agent of the deceased. Currently, twelve states have statutes that act as an absolute bar that prohibit testimony from an interested witness in respect to conversations or transactions with the deceased. www.uslegalforms.com /lawdigest/legaldefinitions.php/dead_man's_statute.htm   (303 words)

North Carolina Appellate Court Cases - Opinions of Court Case Law from NC - North Carolina Court - unoffical reports - ... Gellert (a) violated North Carolina's Dead Man Statute, N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 601(c), (b) was inadmissible hearsay under the North Carolina Rules of Evidence, N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 801, and (c) included improper references to settlement negotiations in violation of Rule 408, N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 408. Wilkie and her answers thereto constituted a waiver” by the children of the Dead Man Statute “to the extent of the matters inquired about in the interrogatories.” Id. When the legislature revised the Dead Man Statute all existing case law exceptions were expressly reserved. www.romingerlegal.com /northcarolina/HTML/000456-1.htm   (2576 words)

02-1173 -- Walker v. Board of Trustees -- 07/21/2003 Salazar's wife to testify about his emotional distress in violation of Colorado's dead man's statute; and (5) the district court erroneously admitted hearsay evidence and concluded the Board's breach of contract was willful and wanton. The dead man's statute prohibits, in relevant part, the testimony of a "person directly interested in the event [of a civil action, suit, or proceeding] when any adverse party sues or defends... Even though she had a direct interest in the outcome of the litigation as the sole heir to her husband's estate, the dead man's statute did not prohibit her testimony because she did not testify "against" the estate. www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/2003/07/02-1173.htm   (5094 words)

MCJI Chapter 6 If heirs, assigns, devisees, legatees, or personal representatives were parties to a suit, the former dead man’s statute, MCL 600.2160, 617.64, prevented testimony by an adverse party as to matters which, if true, must have been equally within the knowledge of the deceased person. The present statute, MCL 600.2166, represents an effort to loosen the strictures of the prior law. In James v Dixon, 95 Mich App 527; 291 NW2d 106 (1980), the court of appeals held that the dead man’s statute was impliedly abrogated by the adoption of MRE 601. courts.michigan.gov /mcji/general-instructions/gen-instructions-ch6.htm   (798 words)

The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing Statutes are published in several different sources, and the particular source must be specified. Statutes may be included in the bibliography, but they are often cited only in notes. Statutes are first published separately, being referred to as slip laws or public laws. www.nutsandboltsguide.com /chicago.html   (5466 words)

OSCN Found Document:THREADGILL v. ANDERSON Nobel's death, is said to be established by the above-quoted statute, was, as specified therein: "* * * such party * * * (as) acquired title to the cause of action" against Mrs. We think the portion of the statute emphasized above is sufficient to show that it does not cover the deposition of Vest, without regard to whether an automobile accident, like the one involved here, is a "transaction" within the meaning of that word as used in one of the opening lines of said statute. 206, is authority for the proposition that the Dead Man's Statute "applies to an action in tort as well as to an action on contract." Under that authority the Dead Man's Statute would apply in this case. www.oscn.net /applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?citeID=26364   (2272 words)

Chapter 4 If a man, having by a woman a child or children, afterward intermarries with her and recognizes the child or children to be his, they are thereby legitimated. (1967) This statute applies not only to a child born out of wedlock, but also to a child born in wedlock, but sired by a man who was not the mother's husband. Statute does not require that child be "recognized" as such by parent or that the child be legitimate. www.moga.state.mo.us /statutes/chapters/chap474.htm   (5949 words)

[No title] There are two kinds of necromancy—evoking the spirit of a dead man through ritual only, and working directly with the corpse to enliven it to speak. This should have alerted Joseph that he was dealing with the spirit of a dead man and that he had to carry out the appropriate rituals described in the occult books he had accepted as truthful. Someone who wanted to evoke the spirit of a dead man was supposed to perform the ritual with the help of a partner or apprentice. www.saintsalive.com /mormonism/necromantic.html   (7225 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us   Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.