| | Harris v. Progessive Hawaii Insurance Corp. (Memorandum Opinion) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-19) |
 | | On December 17, 1998, Harris filed a declaratory judgment action against Progressive, contending that he was entitled to a claim for UIM benefits because his $90,000 settlement had exhausted TIG's $100,000 limit of liability due to the application of the covered loss deductible. |
 | | Subsequently, Progressive filed a motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment action on the grounds that, because Progressive had agreed to participate in arbitration, the declaratory judgment action was moot. |
 | | Progressive contends that the circuit court erred in denying its motion to dismiss and granting Harris's motion for summary judgment because the declaratory judgment action was moot once Progressive agreed to participate in arbitration. |
| www.hawaii.gov /jud/23000mop.htm (1263 words) |