| | Should Audio-Visual Defamation on the Internet be Treated as Libel or Slander? |
 | | Of course, common sense acknowledges that a defamation posted within a live chat room conversation may have been carefully planned in advance, and such is an appropriate question for the factfinder; I only mean to suggest that careful deliberation is less likely in such a forum. |
 | | This suggests that the mere fact that a defamation took place in the context of a writing should not necessarily warrant the conclusion that it is or was more dangerous (despite its assuming a semi-permanency, by virtue of its paper medium), otherwise the libel/slander distinction logically should have been recognized long before the printing press. |
 | | Unlike traditional defamation cases involving local broadcasters and newspapers, is it more foreseeable that a given defamatory statement expressed on one of an innumerable sea of websites may reach few, if any, of those who knew of, or should have reasonably been expected to have otherwise later learned of, the plaintiff or the plaintiff's reputation. |
| www.uiowa.edu /~cyberlaw/cls99/sempaper/zelote416.html (4231 words) |