| |
| | McLaughlin - The Virtues of Deliberation: A Response to "Public Participation in ICANN" |
 | | Given the primarily (though, to be sure, not exclusively) technical nature of its responsibilities, the ICANN model instead seeks to foster a reasonable and legitimate policymaking process that is open, transparent, and available to all, but structured to achieve consensus through dialogue and deliberation among informed stakeholders. |
 | | The ICANN Board acts not as a legislative body that cooks up policies on its own initiative, but as the overseer of this deliberative, bottom-up, consensus-based policy-development process that takes place primarily in the Supporting Organizations. |
 | | By "deliberative", I mean that ICANN's general architecture of Supporting Organizations, advisory committees, task forces, public meetings, and inter-organizational liaisons is intended to force stakeholders from across the Internet, functionally- and geographically-speaking, to engage each other in informed dialogue about pending policy issues. |
| cyber.law.harvard.edu /mclaughlin/mclaughlin-response-publicparticipation.html (3442 words) |
|