| |
| | [No title] |
 | | Commission Preferences The dominant image of the European Commission (Hix, 1999, 52), borrowed from rational choice analyses of bureaucratic actors (see, e.g., Niskanen 1971), is that of a classic bureaucracy, seeking always to extend its own powers and expand its empire. |
 | | Appeal to the Commission’s founding idea may have strengthened the Commission President’s hand in the internal process of preference formation and allowed consistency across Commission preferences to be achieved, but, as a response to the demands of a Convention on the Future of Europe, it condemned the Commission to a position on the sidelines. |
 | | Commission of the European Communities (2002b) Feasibility Study: Contribution to a Preliminary Draft Constitution of the European Union, Working Document http://www.europa.eu.int/futurum/documents/ offtext/const051202_en.pdf (accessed on 7 November 2003) Commission of the European Communities (2002c), Peace, Freedom, Solidarity: Communication of the Commission on the Institutional Architecture, COM (2002) 728 final, 4 December, Brussels, European Commission. |
| www.ps.au.dk /derek/dimitrakopoulosandKassimtheCommissionandtheConvention(forcirculation).doc (6673 words) |
|