
	Where results make sense

Topic: Dicto simpliciter

Related Topics

Converse accident

Logical fallacy

Appeal to consequences

Conjunction fallacy

Amphibology

Argument from silence

Appeal to authority

Chewbacca Defense

Ferdinand Tonnies

Renai game

AZ

List of Dominicans

In the News (Wed 16 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Dicto simpliciter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Dicto simpliciter (Lat.: I speak simply) fallacies are deductive logical fallacies that occur in statistical syllogisms.
		A dicto simpliciter occurs when an acceptable exception is ignored or eliminated.
		To justify the recreational use of opiates by referring to a cancer patient or to justify arresting said cancer patient by comparing him to the recreational user would be a dicto simpliciter.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Dicto_simpliciter (227 words)

	joeindie.com » Dicto Simpliciter, Narcissism and Piracy
		The second is an example of dicto simpliciter, a logical fallacy.
		“Dicto simpliciter” is a sweeping generalization, literally “spoken simply” in Latin.
		3 Responses to “Dicto Simpliciter, Narcissism and Piracy”
	joeindie.com /blog/?p=185 (732 words)

	Dicto simpliciter: Encyclopedia topic (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		Dicto simpliciter fallacies are deductive (deductive: there are several meanings for the word deduction:...
		Accident (Accident: A mishap; especially one causing injury or death) -- a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid
		For inductive (inductive: more facts about this subject) fallacies that may affect the soundness (soundness: A state or condition free from damage or decay) of some statistical syllogisms, see faulty generalization (faulty generalization: a faulty generalization, also known as an inductive fallacy, is any of several errors...
	www.absoluteastronomy.com /reference/dicto_simpliciter (156 words)

	Dicto Simpliciter (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		In Latin, the word "dicto" is a verb that means, not just saying something, but saying it repeatedly, or repeating something that has often been said.
		There is no simple criterion for determining when two cases differ so much that they are not covered by the same rule, and when their differences are merely variations within the scope of the rule.
		The fallacy of Dicto Simpliciter exploits this difficulty.
	www.cuyamaca.net /bruce.thompson/Fallacies/dicto.asp (420 words)

	Argumentation and Critical Thinking Tutorial Main Page (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		" Dicto simpliciter " is another name for the fallacy of accident.
		While guilt by association is a specific kind of fallacy of accident it is too specific to be correctly considered another name for either the fallacy of accident or dicto simpliciter.
		" Dicto simpliciter " is another name for the fallacy of guilt by association.
	www.humboldt.edu /~act/HTML/tests/fallacy1/1.17f.html (65 words)

	Converse accident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		The logical fallacy of converse accident (also called reverse accident, destroying the exception or a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter) is a deductive fallacy that can occur in a statistical syllogism when an exception to a generalization is wrongly called for.
		The opposing kind of dicto simpliciter is accident.
		This page was last modified 07:27, 22 September 2005.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Converse_accident (133 words)

	Fallacy - (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		Fallacy of Accident (also called destroying the exception or a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid) meaning to argue erroneously from a general rule to a particular case, without proper regard to particular conditions which vitiate the application of the general rule; e.g.
		Converse Fallacy of Accident (also called reverse accident, destroying the exception, or a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter) meaning to argue from a special case to a general rule
		Irrelevant Conclusion (also called Ignoratio Elenchi), wherein, instead of proving the fact in dispute, the arguer seeks to gain his point by diverting attention to some extraneous fact (as in the legal story of "No case.
	www.rajputana.com /mediawiki/index.php/Fallacy (2362 words)

	Writing 121: Love is a Fallacy
		Most of these fallacies are common everyday comments that are made which are inaccurate, or broad generalizations that aren’t specific enough.
		For example, Shulman talks about a common fallacy that he calls a “dicto simpliciter”.
		A dicto simpliciter is an argument based an unqualified generalization.
	missyi.teacherhosting.com /blog/archives/000950.html (611 words)

	Love is a Fallacy (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		Before we can think correctly, we must first learn to recognize the common fallacies of logic.
		"Dicto Simpliciter means an argument based on an unqualified generalization.
		"Dicto Simpliciter," she said, wagging her finger at me playfully.
	www.wpunj.edu /cohss/philosophy/courses/MH110/LOVE.HTM (2792 words)

	9 December 04 Bar News
		The logical fallacy dicto simpliciter involves the application of a general rule to situations that are actually exceptions to the rule.
		When someone argues that smoking is not harmful because "my uncle Charley smoked three packs of cigarets a day and he lived to be 90," the person is using dicto simpliciter.
		The argument, "There is no such word as e-mail because it is not in my dictionary," is also a dicto simpliciter argument.
	www.illinoisbar.org /Association/0412i.htm (2042 words)

	CTM Forum Board -> Polygamy in the Bible, which is Polygyny (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		To make it apply to most people you must engage in "dicto simpliciter." You're ignoring the context of the rule and applying it to a specific situation, namely one that it isn't said to apply to.
		"Elders are to be husbands of one wife" Again, "dicto simpliciter." This is a condition of office, not a rant against polygyny.
		The argument using this verse employs the notion that it is an ideal to be strived for.
	www.ctm.org /forum/index.php?showtopic=103 (7976 words)

	Dicto simpliciter: Facts and details from Encyclopedia Topic (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		Dicto simpliciter: Facts and details from Encyclopedia Topic
		Dicto simpliciter fallacies are deductive (There are several meanings for the word deduction:...)
		For inductive[for more info, click this link] fallacies that may affect the soundness (A state or condition free from damage or decay)
	www.absoluteastronomy.com /ref/dicto_simpliciter (688 words)

	Quit Aussie Bashing Schapelle Corby Case Forums discuss life in Bali, Indonesia.
		Dicto simpliciter is the fallacy of sweeping generalization.
		It consists of the application of a broad general rule to an individual case whose special features might make it exceptional.
		To insist that the generalization must apply to each and every case, regardless of individual differences, is to commit the fallacy of dicto simpliciter.
	www.bali-information.com /expat_forum/viewtopic.php?t=6619&start=16.0 (1780 words)

	Political Forum Posts Page 10 of 11 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		However, in your signature, you project the fallacy of dicto simpliciter (sweeping generalization) by stating that "homosexuals" (meaning all homosexuals) say this..""
		The relevant question is not who makes the argument and how, but whether the argument is valid.
		Dicto simpliciter - This is the fallacy of making a sweeping statement and expecting it to be true of every specific case -- in other words, stereotyping
	www.politicalforum.com /viewtopic.php?t=347&start=150 (2610 words)

	Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate
		Therefore women can't pull their weight in a military unit." The problem is that the sweeping statement may be true (on average, women are indeed weaker than men), but it is not necessarily true for every member of the group in question (there are some women who are much stronger than the average).
		Most of the time, it is not necessary to call an opposing debater down for making this fallacy -- it is enough to point out why the sweeping generalization they have made fails to prove their point.
		Since everybody knows what a sweeping generalization is, using the Latin in this case will usually sound condescending.
	www.csun.edu /~dgw61315/fallacies.html (5262 words)

	Fallacious And Audacious
		Fallacy of a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid: "It is a general truth that no one should talk to Leonard, because he is a lying scumbag.
		Therefore, no one should listen to him if he tells them their house is on fire."
		Fallacy of a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter: "I have found it efficacious in warding off Leonard to burn him in the eye with a cigarette; therefore, people in general should burn Leonard in the eye with cigarettes."
	www.ludickid.com /082004.htm (406 words)

	Replies (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		For a start, posting his "art on a site called "Images AGAINST War" is a pretty big indicator to me.
		I really don't have time to get into a logic/fallcies debate on dicto simpliciter, etc. today.
		Freepers can post where ever they like, as long as it does not put US or UK troops in extra danger.
	www.freerepublic.com /focus/f-news/1284102/replies?c=44 (254 words)

	Philosophical Dictionary: Searle-Sheffer
		Latin for "according to something" (in contrast with simpliciter).
		Hence, a common abbreviation for "a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid" and "a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter," Latin designations for the informal fallacies of accident and converse accident.
		Avoidance or outright denial of unpleasant aspects of reality, especially those which might otherwise warrant an unfavorable opinion about ourselves.
	www.philosophypages.com /dy/s4.htm (1172 words)

	Logic: Logical Fallacies
		Come out of generalizations and down to specific case.
		Also called a Sweeping Generalization or Dicto Simpliciter.
		It occurs when a general rule is applied to a particular situation in which the features of that particular situation render the rule inapplicable.
	www.theology.edu /logic/logic23.htm (1879 words)

	The Atheism Web: Logic & Fallacies (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		Complex question / Fallacy of interrogation / Fallacy of presupposition
		The fallacy of accident / Sweeping generalization / Dicto simpliciter
		A sweeping generalization occurs when a general rule is applied to a particular situation, but the features of that particular situation mean the rule is inapplicable.
	www.infidels.org /news/atheism/logic.html (5794 words)

	In the Process: October 2003 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		To RM's volleyball team at practice: "If your defense does not rotate to the right spot on the court, the ball will hit the floor."
		Dicto Simpliciter, ignoring genuine exceptions; and/or False Cause, linking two things that are coincidence.
		Matlock was trying to justify his actions of a few days before.
	pinecoon.blogspot.com /2003_10_01_pinecoon_archive.html (3257 words)

	The world's top accident fallacy websites
		The logical fallacy of accident, also called destroying the exception or a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid, is a deductive fallacy that occurs in a statistical syllogism (an argument based on a generalization) when an exception to the generalization is ignored.
		The opposing kind of dicto simpliciter fallacy is the converse accident.
		Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
	dirs.org /wiki-article-tab.cfm/accident__fallacy_ (304 words)

	List of fallacy pages:A - EvoWiki (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22)
		Browse: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
		A dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter - On the basis of the exceptions from a rule, rejecting the whole rule
		A dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid - generalizing from typical instances
	wiki.cotch.net /index.php/List_of_fallacy_pages:A (3614 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)