| |
| | Civil Disobedience (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-31) |
 | | Elliot Zashin, author of Civil Disobedience and Democracy, defines civil disobedience as, “a knowing violation of public norm (considered binding by local authorities but which may ultimately be invalidated by the courts) as a form of protest: it is non-revolutionary, public, and nonviolent (i.e. |
 | | Socrates, a Greek philosopher, when forced with a suicide execution refused escape because he had profited from the laws of Athens thus far, was given a chance to prove himself innocent, and therefore he was bound to obey all laws and decisions of the government. |
 | | Furthermore, the slippery slope argues that civil disobedience cannot be universalized because the result would be chaos, but Zashin argues, “Civil disobedients do not claim an absolute right to disobey; disobedience is permissible, they claim, only under narrowly defined conditions. |
| members.aol.com /wutsamada2/ethics/essays/roberts.htm (1481 words) |
|