| |
| | The Film Journal...Passionate and informed film criticism from an auteurist perspective. |
 | | Nonetheless, Dogme 95 has produced-appropriated, evolved, even recapitulated-the latest code of cinematic "realism," a substantially poignant feat that must be considered in all its ramifications, beginning with its position along the genealogy of cinematic realism and the ideology of the photographic code. |
 | | The Dogme 95 manifesto and its adherents, by appropriating numerous conventions of classical cinema and alternate codes of cinematic "realism," and by transforming them to meet the cultural standards of Realism posited by our technological praxis, have placed themselves in the contextual history of cinematic realism and in rejection of cinematic aesthetics. |
 | | Dogme 95 itself, the manifesto and movement, can be nothing more than it is: an ephemeral movement, a fleeting political statement that provided the artistic atmosphere for the creation of the films that combine ensemble methodology into the scope of auteurism, that plead anti-genre even in from the cesspool of agreed-upon rules. |
| www.thefilmjournal.com /issue9/dogme95.html (3320 words) |
|