| |
| | FindLaw: U.S. Constitution: Article I: Annotations pg. 32 of 58 |
 | | Ogden: ''The prevailing motive was to regulate commerce; to rescue it from the embarrassing and destructive consequences, resulting from the legislation of so many different States, and to place it under the protection of a uniform law.'' 842 In other words, the constitutional grant was itself a regulation of commerce in the interest of uniformity. |
 | | That, however, the commerce clause, unimplemented by congressional legislation, took from the States any and all power over foreign and interstate commerce was by no means conceded and was, indeed, counterintuitive, considering the extent of state regulation that previously existed before the Constitution. |
 | | Virginia, 321 U.S. The commerce clause, the Court has celebrated, ''does not say what the states may or may not do in the absence of congressional action, nor how to draw the line between what is and what is not commerce among the states. |
| caselaw.lp.findlaw.com /data/constitution/article01/32.html (4347 words) |
|