| | [No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-20) |
 | | The numerous meanings of Doublemint were immediately apparent, at least by association or allusion, to an average English-speaking consumer, depriving it of any descriptive function for the purposes of Article 7(1)(c) of the Trade Mark Regulation, whereas for a consumer with insufficient knowledge of English the term would have a vague and fanciful meaning. |
 | | In nearly a century since Doublemint was first registered as a trade mark in the United States, including many years of registration in the Community, no competitor has sought to use the word descriptively a good indication that the term is not solely descriptive and does not need to be kept in the public domain. |
 | | Finally, whilst doublemint as such may be absent from dictionaries, the degree of lexical invention deployed in its creation is essentially limited to removing the space between two words which may well be used together descriptively. |
| www.curia.eu.int /jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?lang=en&num=79969589C19010191&doc=T&ouvert=T&seance=CONCL&where=() (7098 words) |