| | Inventiveness, Categories, Duality |
 | | I asked a category theorist more or less why his field had not noticed the different physical and mathematical applications of subraction [or subtraction-addition] and division [or multiplication-division], and his reply was that the distributive law distinguishes them by a[b plus c] = ab plus ac, [b plus c]a = ba plus ca. |
 | | Duality was Inventive, and yet there are some signs already that people are explaining this not by urging an Inventive Axiom [something like Almost Nothing is Answered which is not Inventive] but by appealing to Necessity. |
 | | Duality was certainly Necessary because scientists did not know how to create masses from knowledge of non-massive theories, how to understand non-perturbation from perturbation, how to understand weak coupling from strong coupling and vice versa, how to understand different energy regimes, etc. |
| superstringtheory.com /forum/dualboard/messages8/75.html (595 words) |