| |
| | Misusing Dynamic Binding When Static Binding Would Do, Part 2 |
 | | JWAA solves this in the obvious manner, by using Java as the configuration language and avoids dynamic substitutes such as XML, properties files, resource files, and the like, reserving dynamic binding for those rare cases where only dynamic binding will do. |
 | | Object-oriented old-timers will be familiar with my early work with Objective-C and will probably be surprised at what may seem a condemnation of dynamic binding from me. After all, Objective-C is a language that simply adds Smalltalk-style dynamic binding to C. This misinterprets the point of this rant. |
 | | This is not a condemnation of dynamic binding, which can be invaluable when used appropriately. |
| softwaredev.earthweb.com /java/sdjojta/article/0,,12401_929491,00.html (1362 words) |
|