| | N.T. Wright: "Communion is bound to conclude ECUSA has specifically chosen not to comply with Windsor." (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05) |
 | | In particular (references are to paragraphs of the Report), there is a strong note of sorrow for the way in which ECUSA has ‘contributed to division in the Body of Christ’ (7) and followed the pattern of America’s imperial actions in the world (10). |
 | | It mentions (46) ‘five specific requests’ that have come from WR, Dromantine, and ACC-13, of which the first two are for moratoria on elections to the episcopate of those living in same-gender unions and on public rites of blessing for such unions, but again doesn’t quote the specific request of WR 134. |
 | | In particular, we note Resolution A167, whose second and third parts have been widely, and in my view rightly, seen as reaffirming previous ECUSA commitments to work in the opposite direction to the main thrust of Lambeth 1.10 (there is no controversy, I think, about the commitment of that resolution to the ‘listening process’). |
| www.acn-us.org /archive/2006/06/nt-wright-communion-is-bound-to-conclude-ecusa-has-specifically-chosen-not-to-comply-with-windsor.html (2635 words) |