| |
| |
evilution is good for you: Pre-Darwinists (4) Edward Blyth |
 | | Blyth correctly saw the concept of natural selection as a mechanism by which the sick, old and unfit were removed from a population; that is, as a preserving factor and for the maintenance of the status quo—the created kind [Wieland, C. Muddy waters: Clarifying the confusion about natural selection]. |
 | | Blyth begins by noting that the word 'variety' is "very commonly misapplied to individuals of a species, which are merely undergoing a regular natural change, either progressing from youth to maturity, or gradually shifting, according to fixed laws, their colours with the seasons". |
 | | Blyth suggests that such a deviation, that is a true variety, "most probably, could only be restored, in a direct manner, by the way in which the variety was first produced," whereby he would most likely have meant a new deviation to counter the first one. |
| evilution-is-good-for-you.blogspot.com /2006/10/pre-darwinists-4-edward-blyth.html (1897 words) |
|