| |
| | week68 |
 | | But instead of "time-dependent sets", let's act like topos theorists and call them simply "objects", and instead of talking about one being a "subset" of another, let's say one is a "subobject" of another. |
 | | After studying this sort of thing a while, it's rather hard to go on pretending that the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms of set theory, which were cooked up in the early 20th century to escape the logical paradoxes of Russell and others, are the last word on "foundations". |
 | | One can develop topos theory within set theory if one wishes, but one can also set up topos theory from scratch, as a kind of pluralistic foundation of mathematics. |
| math.ucr.edu /home/baez/week68.html (2650 words) |
|