| |
| | Ancient Society by Lewis H. Morgan 1877 |
 | | McLennan’s new terms, 8220;Exogamy and Endogamy” are of questionable utility — that as used in “Primitive Marriage”; their positions are reversed, and that “endogamy” has very little application to the facts treated in that work while 8220;exogamy”; is simply a rule of a gens, and should be stated as such. |
 | | from exogamy to endogamy, or from endogamy to exogamy”; (115); “they may be equally archaic” (116); and “they are in some respects” equally rude (116); but before the discussion ends, “endogamy” rises to the superior position, and stands over toward civilization, while 8220;exogamy”; falls back in the direction of savagery. |
 | | Advancing from this state of things, the first check upon “endogamy” is found in the punaluan group, which sought to exclude own brothers and sisters from the marriage relation, while it retained in that relation first, second, and more remote cousins, still under the name of brothers and sisters. |
| www.marxists.org /reference/archive/morgan-lewis/ancient-society/ch27.htm (6072 words) |
|