| |
| | Maureen Bacon v. Town of Enfield |
 | | Taylor, Enfields planning and zoning administrator, testified that the purpose of the fifty-foot setback requirement was to protect the towns resources, specifically the lakes, ponds and wetlands. |
 | | Bacons home is in the Rural Residential (R3) District and is subject to article IV, section 401.2M of the Town of Enfield zoning ordinance (ordinance), which prohibits structures within fifty feet of the seasonal high water mark of Crystal Lake. |
 | | The defendant, Town of Enfield (town), has interpreted its ordinance, however, to forbid any new construction that adds to the footprint of such homes without a variance. |
| www.courts.state.nh.us /supreme/opinions/2004/bacon005.htm (4705 words) |
|