| |
| | On the idiomatic status of English compounds. (Linguistics). | Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: international review of ... |
 | | Zandvoort (1966: 277) writes to say that "English has a great many examples of vocables which, though felt and used as single words, are made up of two or more elements each of which may also be used as a separate word. |
 | | It is shown, put briefly, that in original compounds only the first element is stressed (because of its being the distinctive part of the complex), e.g., goldfish, flbird, statesman, with occasional complete phonetic obscurity in the latter element, as in cupboard, forehead, or possibly in both, e.g., shepherd. |
 | | The complexes showing a tendency towards becoming recent compounds are not easy to follow either; one can only wonder what it is that tells the native speaker to accentuate differently 'country 'town, 'country folk, 'countryman, 'country music, country 'house, (and also country 'seat) while both country 'dance and 'country dance are possible. |
| www.accessmylibrary.com /coms2/summary_0286-11340444_ITM (0 words) |
|