| | The Notwithstanding Clause of the Charter (BP194e) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-09-17) |
 | | In 1993, when the notwithstanding clause reached the end of its five-year life, the Quebec National Assembly lifted the ban on English language signs and amended the law to require only that French be “markedly predominant.”(27) The amended legislation was not protected by a notwithstanding clause. |
 | | The notwithstanding clause should be kept, at least for the present. It permits debate about which rights are fundamental in Canadian society and which should prevail when rights are in conflict. In a democratic society steeped in the tradition of parliamentary supremacy, it is proper to give our elected legislators the final word. |
 | | But isn’t the point of entrenching rights in a charter that you protect those rights by making the courts the final arbiters rather than the legislatures? Yes, it is, and despite the notwithstanding clause, that is what has happened and will continue to happen in all but a few situations. |
| www.parl.gc.ca /information/library/PRBpubs/bp194-e.htm (2533 words) |