| |
| | KONSTAN.html |
 | | Christopher Gill resolves the paradox of Epicurean altruism in a more subtle way, by invoking the idea of generalized reciprocity, which, as he describes it, accepts localized episodes of pain and distress on behalf of the friend, and does not look for utility or pleasure on a piecemeal, contractual basis (324). |
 | | So too in Epicureanism the capacity for friendship and, along with this, I suggest, a disinterested desire for the good of the other, are part of our biological inheritance: we are as eager, in Lucretius formulation, not to harm others as we are to go unharmed. |
 | | An Epicurean, to be sure, will desire pleasure for a friend, whereas Aristotle would have desired his happiness, or whatever the friend believed to be good. |
| www.apaclassics.org /Publications/PresTalks/KONSTAN.html (6306 words) |
|