| |
| | Essig, Frederick B.*, James R. Garey, and Jonathan M. Slomba. (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-01) |
 | | A more sound basis for classification, based on seedling morphology, reproductive compatibility, and a reevaluation of a number of vegetative and floral characters, was suggested by earlier work. |
 | | A major feature of a new classification would be the division of at least the bulk of the genus into two subgenera, one exhibiting classical epigeal germination and alternate seedling phyllotaxy, and the other exhibiting a type of hypogeal germination and opposite seedling phyllotaxy. |
 | | The proposed major divisions of the genus are being tested with a phylogenetic study based on DNA sequence data, which will be expanded as part of the development of a comprehensive new classification. |
| www.ou.edu /cas/botany-micro/botany2000/section13/abstracts/15.shtml (240 words) |
|