| |
| | Sample Chapter for Auerbach, E.; Trask, W., trans.: Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. |
 | | The refinement of Auerbach's own writing about Dante is truly exhilarating to read, not just because of his complex, paradox-filled insights, but as he nears the end of the chapter, because of their Nietzschean audacity, often venturing toward the unsayable and the inexpressible, beyond normal or for that matter even divinely set limits. |
 | | Auerbach's choice of Dante for advancing the radically humanistic thesis carefully works through the great poet's Catholic ontology as a phase transcended by the Christian epic's realism, which is shown to be "ontogenetic," that is, "we are given to see, in the realm of timeless being, the history of man's inner life and unfolding" (202). |
 | | Auerbach never loses sight of his original ideas about the separation and mingling of styles--how, for instance, classicism in France returned to the vogue for antique models and the high style, and late-eighteenth-century German romanticism overturned those norms by way of a hostile reaction to them in works of sentiment and passion. |
| www.pup.princeton.edu /chapters/i50.html (6526 words) |
|