| |
| | [No title] |
 | | Koch had return rights to a position in Chicago, his actual residence and the home of record to which he would have been entitled to travel expenses upon completion of his tour of duty overseas, but he accepted a transfer from Germany to Fort McPherson, a different CONUS location. |
 | | Koch did not have a travel and transportation entitlement to Chicago and then to Fort McPherson, but only an entitlement from his old duty station in Germany to his new duty station in Fort McPherson, citing Roger E. Dexter, B-214904 (Sept. 5, 1984). |
 | | Further, the Comptroller General in Koch reasoned that because the claimant had traveled to his new duty station at Fort McPherson not by a usually traveled route but by a circuitous route via Chicago, he was responsible for the excess cost, citing then pertinent provisions of the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR). |
| www.gsbca.gsa.gov /relo/r1583812.txt (823 words) |
|