| |
| | 03-594 |
 | | In C.J.S., the doctrine of judicial estoppel was defined as a doctrine that is not strictly of estoppel, but also "partakes rather of the positive rules of procedure based on manifest justice and, to a greater or lesser degree, on considerations of the orderliness, regularity, and expeditious of litigation." 31 C.J.S. §117 at 378. |
 | | Under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, as distinguished from equitable estoppel by inconsistency, a party is estopped merely by the fact of having alleged or admitted in his pleadings in a former proceeding under oath the contrary of the assertion sought to be made. |
 | | Judicial estoppel is intended to protect the integrity of the courts, not to provide "a sword to be wielded by adversaries" in an attempt to avoid potential liability. |
| courts.state.ar.us /opinions/2004a/20040108/03-594.html (5170 words) |
|