Where results make sense

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us

Topic: Ethical relativism

    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

Ads by Google

In the News (Mon 13 Oct 08)

Arizona Cardinals

Beverly Hills

Reggie Bush

Shane Watson

Morgan Tsvangirai

Bank of America 500

Jeff Burton

Kimi Raikkonen

Robert Mugabe

Zaheer Khan

Moral relativism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In philosophy, Moral relativism is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect absolute or universal truths but instead are relative to social, cultural, historical or personal references, and that there is no single standard by which to assess an ethical proposition's truth. Moral relativism is not the same as moral pluralism, or value pluralism, which acknowledges the co-existence of opposing ideas and practices, but does not require that they be equally valid. Moral relativism stands in marked contrast to moral absolutism, moral realism, and moral naturalism, which all maintain that there are moral facts, facts that can be both known and judged, whether through some process of verification or through intuition. en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Ethical_relativism   (1902 words)

RELATIVISM Ethical nihilism does have one problem in common with ethical relativism: if you are an ethical nihilist, then you are committed to having no ethical beliefs at all, not even beliefs like the one about torturing children cited in the previous paragraph. Ethical relativism itself is not an ethical belief. Relativism is anti-authoritarian only in the sense that it takes away any reason you might have for considering the opinions and arguments of others in forming your beliefs (for instance, the opinion of someone better informed than you are). www.people.cornell.edu /pages/rcc2/relativism.html   (8094 words)

Ethics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia There are several sub-branches of applied ethics examining the ethical problems of different professions, such as business ethics, medical ethics, engineering ethics and legal ethics, while technology assessment and environmental assessment study the effects and implications of new technologies or projects on nature and society. Each branch to characterize common issues and problems that arise in the ethical codes of the professions, and define their common responsibility to the public, e.g. For example, the issue of abortion is an applied ethical topic since it involves a specific type of controversial behavior. en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Ethical   (2506 words)

Ethical Relativism Within ethical relativism, right and wrong are not absolute and must be determined in society by a combination of observation, logic, social preferences and patterns, experience, emotions, and "rules" that seem to bring the most benefit. Therefore, ethical relativism would not support the idea of an absolute God and it would exclude religious systems based upon absolute morals; that is, it would be absolute in its condemnation of absolute ethics. Ethical relativism is the position that there are no moral absolutes, no moral right and wrongs. www.carm.org /relativism/ethical.htm   (985 words)

Relativism [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] Relativism is sometimes identified (usually by its critics) as the thesis that all points of view are equally valid. Critics of relativism typically dismiss such views as incoherent since they imply the validity even of the view that relativism is false. Thus, forms of moral relativism assert the relativity of moral values; forms of epistemological relativism assert the relativity of knowledge. www.utm.edu /research/iep/r/relativi.htm   (352 words)

ETHICAL RELATIVISM To deny relativism by saying that there is one or more universal moral truth(s) is not to say that everyone, everywhere, and at all times have observed this truth, or believed in it, or even known about it. In relativism, the answer is: what is right or wrong for a given individual is whatever that person’s culture (or society, or religion, etc) says is right or wrong. Second, some embrace relativism because they do not make any distinction about the descriptive facts of moral behavior -- what is (a subject for anthropology and perhaps other social sciences) and prescriptive morality-- what should be (the proper subject of moral philosophy or ethics). www.ccaurora.edu /phi112177/relativism.htm   (1025 words)

Ethical Relativism Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. Ethical relativism reminds us that different societies have different moral beliefs and that our beliefs are deeply influenced by culture. If ethical relativism is correct, there can be no common framework for resolving moral disputes or for reaching agreement on ethical matters among members of different societies. www.scu.edu /ethics/publications/iie/v5n2/relativism.html   (1006 words)

Relativism Relativism about truth boils down to relativism about belief, but rather different sets of issues are typically connected with central beliefs or principles, on the one hand, and issues about relative truth, on the other. Descriptive semantic relativism, as we will use the phrase, is the empirical claim that different groups, e.g., people living at different times or in different cultures, sometimes have different beliefs about the meaning of a word (where words are individuated independently of their meanings by such things as pronunciation or spelling). Normative relativism is a family of non-empirical normative or evaluative claims to the effect that modes of thought, standards of reasoning, or the like are only right or wrong, correct or incorrect, veridical or non-veridical, relative to a framework. plato.stanford.edu /entries/relativism   (18149 words)

The Truth in Ethical Relativism Ethical relativism is the thesis that ethical principles or judgments are relative to the individual or culture. Ethical theories are important not because they solve all moral dilemmas but because they help us notice salient features of moral problems and help us understand those problems in context. In that respect ethical theories and grammar serve similar functions: good grammarians may not be effective communicators; however, a grasp of grammar empowers us to communicate effectively. www.stpt.usf.edu /hhl/papers/relative.htm   (4581 words)

Rachels-relativism Ethical relativism (JGS def.) is a doctrine that there is no basis — in the nature of things — to allow us to make a grounded value judgments such as A is better than B. All we can do is say that this or that culture believe some actions are ethically better than others. Hence, if ethical relativism asks us to present a universal and absolute code that all peoples agree to, this is more than we can do. Cultural relativism (JGS def.) can be seen as a method in the social sciences that counsels us to seek first to understand and that warns us that if we cannot lay aside (temporarily) our own cultural assumptions, it will be nearly impossible for us to inhabit the thought forms and value systems of another culture. facstaff.elon.edu /sullivan/rachels-relativism.htm   (1952 words)

The Peace Encyclopedia: Moral Relativism, Moral Equivalence, Ethical Relativism, Cultural Relativism, Egalitarianism Reinforcing this relativism is the behavioral doctrine that humanity in general, and their rulers in particular, employ altruistic language like "peace" or "justice" or the "common good" to conceal egotistical motives or dignify self-serving ends. "...relativism erodes belief in the truth or justice of their country's cause and thereby undermines their country's ability to persevere in any conflict with regimes whose educators are not relativists". Another indication of a flawed religion no one questions in an era of cultural relativism. www.yahoodi.com /peace/mrelativism.html   (1787 words)

ETHICAL SYSTEMS Some people support ethical relativism in the mistaken belief that the only alternative is moral absolutism (the belief that there are moral rules to which there are no exceptions). Cultural Relativism: as long as the individual behaves in a way which is consistent with the moral beliefs of their culture, there is no basis for criticising them. The ethical value of an action is determined by the desirability of the outcome it produces. www.qucis.queensu.ca /home/cisc497a/2004F/Ethical_Systems_2004.html   (817 words)

Ethical Relativism: History Nevertheless, this history will provide a brief survey of several popular theories of ethics, introduce some of the terminology that is used either to state or describe ethical theories, and clarify some of the philosophical issues that must be resolved in order to develop a reasoned position on relativism. The core of the emotivist theory was the claim that ethical judgments such as "Murder is morally wrong" were neither true nor false in the same sense that we apply to descriptive statements like "John is dead." Instead, ethical judgements expressed the attitudes or emotions of the speaker or evoked attitudes in the hearer. These included the claim that ethical statements were neither true nor false in the same sense that factual statements were true or false. users.telerama.com /~jdehullu/ethics/erhist.htm   (2351 words)

Relativism According to MacKinnon, ethical relativism is the view that ethical values and beliefs are relative to the various individuals or societies that hold them (p.12). Note the contrast between science and morality that often forms the basis for generating support for ethical relativism. This is the view that ethical values vary from society to society and that the basis for moral judgments lies in these social or cultural views. www.ccaurora.edu /phi112/relativism.htm   (1085 words)

Catholic Culture : Document Library : 'Who's to Judge': a Reply to Ethical Relativism Logically, there is no basis for relativism in a "Who's to judge?" that arises out of puzzlement regarding an ethical question. For relativism is precisely a denial of this. Finally, relativism must recognize the importance of seeking truth on the part of its listeners, for it tries to persuade them that relativism is true. www.catholicculture.org /docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=2791   (4095 words)

DA241.htm Another example of how ethical relativism affects the way many people approach public moral issues can be seen in the arguments concerning the right to boycott products advertised on television programs which certain groups believe are psychologically and morally harmful. Ethical, moral, and social issues are beginning to dominate the headlines of major newspapers and the front covers of leading magazines. Moral relativism has been rejected by a near unanimous number of both secular and theistic ethicists and philosophers. www.equip.org /free/DA241.htm   (2989 words)

Ethical Relativism Each version of ethical relativism, then, is composed of both a negative and a positive element—the negative claim that there are no absolute or objective ethical truths and a positive account of that to which ethical truths are relative. Because conventional relativism subordinates the will of the individual to the will of the culture or society, it seems that little room is left over for individuals to make their own, autonomous decisions about how they ought to live their lives. Subjective relativism is also able to provide a seemingly more acceptable verdict in the case of reformers who challenge or reject the values of their culture. www.acsu.buffalo.edu /~jbeebe2/relativ.htm   (10646 words)

Relativism defined Contemporary ethical relativism can be traced to the Finnish anthropologist, Edward Westermarck, and his books Ethical Relativity and The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas. 'Relativism' is a philosophical theory asserting that there is no absolute truth, only truth relative to the individual, or to a particular time or culture, or both. A close cousin to relativism is "subjectivism", essentially the belief that all beliefs are purely matters of personal opinion. www.progressiveliving.org /relativism_defined.htm   (236 words)

Ethical Relativism and Absolute Taboos But ethical or cultural relativism and the various schools of pragmatism ignore the fact that certain ethical percepts - probably grounded in human nature - do appear to be universal and ancient. Incest is the ethical and legal prohibition to have sex with a related person or to marry him or her - even if the people involved are consenting and fully informed adults. Protagoras, the Greek Sophist, was the first to notice that ethical codes are culture-dependent and vary in different societies, economies, and geographies. samvak.tripod.com /taboo.html   (2451 words)

DE195.htm Ethical relativism eliminates the notion of a moral mistake. In the modern Western world, ethical relativism poses a challenge to the biblical basis for ethics. Relativism is seen as required for a democracy of ideas and norms. www.equip.org /free/DE195.htm   (1064 words)

Ethical Relativism If this were all that ethical relativists were saying, it would be old hat and there would be no controversy. Almost all ethical theorists allow that the right or the good thing to do varies with circumstances. There may be some moralists who have denied this sort of thing, but not many. ivory.lm.com /~jdehullu/ethics/intro_19.htm   (90 words)

Stacequestions Stace clarifies his explanation of ethical relativism saying first that it is NOT ‘merely’ the view ‘that the very same kind of action which is thought right in one country and period may be thought wrong in another’. What does he then say that ethical relativism is? Explain so as to make his clarification clear. What is the first argument in favor of ethical relativism that Stace considers? faculty.mc3.edu /barmstro/stacequestions.html   (346 words)

HU329 NOTES ON LOGIC (ARGUMENT EVALUATION) AND ETHICAL RELATIVISM According to ethical relativism, whether one has a certain moral obligation depends on the moral values of one's society. If ethical relativism is true, then the moral codes of different societies are all equally valid. In at least some instances, whether one has a certain moral obligation (e.g., to care for one's maternal aunts and uncles in their old age) depends on the moral values of one's society. www.hu.mtu.edu /~tlockha/hu329ov3.htm   (272 words)

relativism and universalism Basic ethical standards (the fundamental moral principles) are universally correct; they are applicable to all similarly situated people (in all societies, at all times). This implies that relativism is relativism is true. Basic ethical principles are extremely simple and admit to hardly any (or no) exceptions). www.tamucc.edu /~sencerz/relat.htm   (1237 words)

Relativism Relativism is the philosophical position that all points of view are equally valid and that all truth is relative to the individual. See to it that no one takes you captive through empty deception. www.carm.org /relativism.htm   (59 words)

Ethical Relativism   Ethical Relativism:  The view that what is ethically right is relative either to the individual (Individual Relativism or Subjectivism) or to one’s culture (Cultural Relativism or Conventionalism). Ethical Relativism:  What it is, and objections thereagainst There can be no argument about what is right and wrong, no matter how sure you are that they have done something wrong. www.mc.maricopa.edu /~yount/text/relativism.html   (506 words)

Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy Note that ethical relativism does not logically follow from any truths uncovered by descriptive relativism. Note also that the ethical relativist has a hard time explaining how radical moral change can occur within a certain society (as with slavery or women's suffrage in the United States). The Problem of Relativism: What one society considers Right, another Society considers Wrong. caae.phil.cmu.edu /Cavalier/80130/part2/sect6.html   (281 words)

Table of contents for Library of Congress control number 2001416187 Positivism, Postmodernism and Ethical Relativism I. Metaethical Theories II. Cultural and Ethical Relativism I. Cultural Relativism II. Cultural-Ethical Relativism: A Critique I. The Limited Validity of Cultural Relativism II. www.loc.gov /catdir/toc/fy031/2001416187.html   (175 words)

Search Results for ethical - Encyclopædia Britannica Ethical relativism, then, is a radical doctrine that is contrary to what many thoughtful people commonly assume. Includes a bibliographic survey of the topic, with separate headings for historical statements of egoism, altruism, sociobiology and altruism, critiques of and arguments for ethical egoism, ethical egoism and moral sensitivity, and libertarianism. All of the normative theories considered so far have had a universal focus—i.e., if they have been consequentialist theories, the goods they sought to achieve were sought for all capable of... www.britannica.com /search?query=ethical&submit=Find&source=MWTEXT   (578 words)

Ethics Surveys: Ethical Relativism It is hopeless to try to arrive at a final answer to ethical questions. No one has the right to intervene when they think someone else has done something morally wrong. ethics.acusd.edu /ActiveWebSurvey/Theory/Survey001_Relativism.html   (86 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us   Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.