| |
| | urticator.net - No Pure Strategy Is Stable |
 | | Now, I know about “tit for tat” (see Evolutionarily Stable Strategies), and am quite fond of it, but I thought that description was a bit strong. |
 | | If, for example, the pure strategy is nice, i.e., never the first to defect, then its behavior in response to a defection is never explored, and any other nice strategy can invade it—just as the strategy that always cooperates can invade “tit for tat”. |
 | | The original strategies all do equally well when they play each other; the only thing that distinguishes them is how well they do when they play the mutants … and, as it happens, one can always find mutants that will make the original pure strategy lose. |
| www.urticator.net /essay/4/427.html (670 words) |
|