| |
| | [No title] |
 | | In fact, the growing influence of Peircean ideas in the fields of cognitive linguistics, diachronic linguistics, linguistic semantics and pragmatics, and text linguistics is largely due to general semiotic insights which linguist have derived from Peirce (see, e.g., Ransdell 1980; Wirth 1983; Gorlée 1994; Réthoré 1994). |
 | | On the contrary, the rise of Peirce in linguistics is closely associated with the decline of structural linguistics. |
 | | A Peircean distinction which has meanwhile become part of the general terminology of linguistics and which is in particular indispensable to statistical linguistics is the one between the word as a type and as a token (or replica; CP 2.292, 4.447, 4.537, 8.334; Fisch 1986: 357; Pape 1996: 313). |
| www.digitalpeirce.fee.unicamp.br /p-ling.htm (3157 words) |
|