| |
| | Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880) - U.S. Supreme Court - |
 | | 163) and Ex parte Parks, 93 U.S. In the former case, we held that the judgment was void, and released the petitioner accordingly; in the latter, we held that the judgment, whether erroneous or not, was not void, because the court had jurisdiction of the cause; and we refused to interfere. |
 | | Corp., B. The latter part of this rule, when applied to imprisonment under conviction and sentence, is confined to cases of clear and manifest want of criminality in the matter charged, such as in effect to render the proceedings void. |
 | | They relate to elections of members of the House of Representatives, and were an assertion, on the part of Congress, of a power to pass laws for regulating and superintending said elections, and for securing the purity thereof, and the rights of citizens to vote thereat peaceably and without molestation. |
| www.vlex.us /caselaw/U-S-Supreme-Court/Ex-parte-Siebold-100-U-S-371-1880/2100-20061567,01.html (7305 words) |
|