| |
| | Glidden Co. v. Zdanok |
 | | Those doubts, suggested by dicta in Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S., 460, would be expanded, rather than allayed, were we to hold that the judges of the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals enjoy the protections of Article III while leaving at large the status of those courts. |
 | | Despite Ex parte McCardle, supra, the Court refused to apply the statute to a case in which the claimant had already been adjudged entitled to recover by the Court of Claims, calling it an unconstitutional attempt to invade the judicial province by prescribing a rule of decision in a pending case. |
 | | Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U.S. 438, 453, 458; accord, Williams v. |
| supct.law.cornell.edu /supct/search/display.html?terms=religion%20and%20free%20or%20establishment&url=/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0370_0530_ZO.html (14126 words) |
|