
	Where results make sense

Topic: Executive Order 13224

Related Topics

King Yi of Zhou (Ji Jian)

Alexander Frumkin

Ip Ching

Dreadnought

Chrysler

Rail Blue

Lead up to the Warsaw Uprising

Basilica Cistern

Euphemism

In the News (Sun 3 Jun 12)

EXECUTIVE POWER

Iran

ANALYSIS

Pakistan

Family compact

	Executive Order 13224
		Executive Order 13224 gives the U.S. Government a powerful tool to impede terrorist funding and is part of our national commitment to lead the international effort to bring a halt to the evil of terrorist activity.
		In general terms, the Order provides a means by which to disrupt the financial support network for terrorists and terrorist organizations by authorizing the U.S. government to designate and block the assets of foreign individuals and entities that commit, or pose a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism.
		The Executive Order authorizes both the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General, or the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, to designate individuals and entities pursuant to the specified criteria described above.
	www.state.gov /s/ct/rls/fs/2002/16181.htm (1452 words)

	Global Relief appeal
		To the extent that GRF was attacking the factual support for the interim order, time has passed that issue by; the right question now is whether the designation of October 18 is supported by adequate information, and that question cannot be resolved until the district court has assembled a new record.
		Executive Order 13224, which was issued before enactment of the USA PATRIOT Act, could not have delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury those powers added to the IEEPA by the new law.
		Application of the IEEPA is not a bill of attainder; implementation of the statute is in the hands of the Executive and Judicial Branches, while a bill of attainder is a decision of guilt made by the Legislative Branch.
	www.kentlaw.edu /perritt/courses/admin/global-relief-appeal.htm (2959 words)

	News from the Washington File
		(Executive Order 13224 now includes Basque groups Batasuna, Euskal Herritarrok, and Herri Batasuna) (370) Three groups associated with the Basque terrorist group ETA are being added to the list of groups named under Executive Order 13224, which blocks property and prohibits transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism.
		The designation of ETA under Executive Order 13224 is being amended to include the groups Batasuna, Euskal Herritarrok, and Herri Batasuna, which "have supported ETA's acts of terrorism" in Spain, according to the State Department.
		The action to amend the Executive Order 13224 designation of ETA to include Batasuna, Euskal Herritarrok, and Herri Batasuna is based on substantial and credible information from a variety of sources that those entities were formed at ETA's direction and functioned as part of ETA.
	globalsecurity.org /security/library/news/2003/05/sec-030507-usia01.htm (236 words)

	OFAC - Keep America Safe and Secure
		Executive Order 13224 is to reduce money laundering and squash the flow of dollars to anti-American organizations overseas.
		The executive order required the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) to make available to financial institutions (which includes car dealerships) a list of blocked persons known as Specially Designated Nationals (SDN).
		The order, among other things, prohibits U.S. citizens and business entities from entering into any transaction or dealing with individuals or entities who have been linked to terrorism and appear on the list of blocked persons.
	www.ofaciq.com /ofacarticle2.html (384 words)

	Terrorism - Terrorist Finances (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-07-31)
		Executive Order 12947, signed in January 1995, seized assets from those deemed detrimental to the Middle East peace process.
		Executive Order 13099, signed in August 1998, prohibited any transaction in the United States carried out by any group on the Treasury's "Specifically Designated Terrorists" list.
		Executive Order 13099 is an amendment to EO 12947.
	www.cdi.org /terrorism/financial-pr.cfm (3349 words)

	ISDC/FEDERAL REGISTER Vol. 67, No. 128
		The Annex to Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, is amended by adding thereto the following persons in appropriate alphabetical order: Mohammed Omar (aka, Amir al-Mumineen [Commander of the Faithful]) The Taliban.
		For the purposes of this order and Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, the term "the Taliban" is also known as the "Taleban," "Islamic Movement of Taliban," "the Taliban Islamic Movement," "Talibano Islami Tahrik," and "Tahrike Islami'a Taliban".
		The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, is hereby authorized to modify the definition of the term "the Taliban," as appropriate.
	www.epa.gov /isdc/eo13268.htm (150 words)

	TH&T \| Publications \| Article Search Results
		The Order makes U.S. businesses responsible for monitoring their current interactions with, among others, investors, joint venturers, trading partners and customers, and, in certain circumstances, reporting to the U.S. government any such party that is listed in the Order.
		Given the broad scope of the Order, all U.S. businesses, including venture capital funds, venture-backed portfolio companies and publicly traded companies, must re-examine how they do business, especially with individuals and entities from geographical regions where terrorist groups are known to operate, and implement other operational procedures to comply with the Order.
		The Order requires such businesses to be diligent in examining their respective relationships with individuals and entities as well as their backgrounds, especially in the context of sources of capital, investments and transactions with other businesses.
	www.tht.com /pubs/SearchMatchPub.asp?ArticleID=769 (1158 words)

	[No title]
		While the Order is not limited to international transactions, the risk of a potential violation is obviously greater in that context, especially when dealing with individuals not otherwise known to the company who are from countries with known links to terrorists.
		In other words, under the broad language of the Order, a franchisor might still be held civilly liable for transacting business with a person who has been designated a suspected terrorist, even though the company had no knowledge or reason to know that it was transacting business with a suspected terrorist.
		However, because the Order was signed so recently, it is unknown at this time the extent to which civil penalties will be sought from “non-willful” violators.
	www.venulex.com /printdoc.asp?docID=1628 (1053 words)

	Imposition and Expansion of Controls on Designated Terrorists
		In response to grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism, Executive Order 13224 blocks the property and interests in property of persons listed in an Annex to the order and persons designated by the Secretary of State or the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to criteria set forth in the order.
		Section 744.16 prohibits exports and reexports by U.S. persons of items subject to the EAR to persons designated pursuant to Executive Order 13088, as amended by Executive Order 13192, including Slobodan Milosevic, his close associates, and persons determined to be under open indictment by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
		All persons designated in or pursuant to Executive Order 13224 are identified in Appendix A to 31 CFR Chapter V by the bracketed initials [SDGT] and are also known as Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).
	www.bis.doc.gov /PoliciesAndRegulations/TerroristReg6_6.htm (3612 words)

	PublicEye.org - Website of Political Research Associates
		Rather than dissenting, major foundations are inappropriately acting as anti-terrorism enforcers, creating a funding chill in international grant making and perhaps even encouraging advocacy groups to be less open in their criticism of the current administration.
		Executive Order 13224, signed by President Bush on September 24, 2001 — right after the 9/11 attacks and a month before Congress passed the USA Patriot Act — broadly prohibits "transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism."
		The Executive Order introduced a fllist of individuals and organizations suspected of terrorism, materially aiding terrorism, or associating with terrorists.
	www.publiceye.org /magazine/v19n2/odendahl_guest.html (1524 words)

	In Context: Crystal clear
		Executive Order 13224 designated 27 individuals and entities that commit or pose a significant risk of committing terrorist acts and authorized the Secretary of State to designate additional individuals and entities.
		Pending more detailed guidance, USAID posts and Washington-based COs and CTOs are requested to ensure that all USAID contractors and recipients are aware of Executive Order 13224 and the names of the individuals and entities designated thereunder.
		It is the legal responsibility of the contractor/recipient to ensure compliance with these Executive Orders and laws.
	incontext.blogmosis.com /archives/020012.html (534 words)

	Arkansas Bar Association \| Publications
		On September 24, 2001, President Bush issued Executive Order 13224 (the "Order"), which in part prohibits "any transaction or dealing by United States persons or within the United States in property or interests in property" of suspected terrorists or those who are associated with suspected terrorists.
		The Order applies not only to transactions with suspected terrorists, but also those who assist in, sponsor or provide support or services for, or are associated with suspected terrorists, and those who are owned or controlled by, or act for or on behalf of suspected terrorists.
		The bottom line with respect to both the Order and the Act is that it is advisable for all persons to whom they potentially apply, which is just about anyone involved in the real estate industry, to immediately set up a compliance program.
	www.arkbar.com /Ark_Lawyer_Mag/Articles/TerrorismSummer06.html (939 words)

	Judge Strikes Down Parts of Executive Order on Terrorism
		U.S. District Judge Audrey B. Collins, in a ruling released late Monday, found that two provisions of an executive order signed Sept. 23, 2001, are impermissibly vague because they allow the president to unilaterally designate organizations as terrorist groups and broadly prohibit association with such groups.
		The latest case focuses on Executive Order 13224, which is aimed at cutting off financing to alleged terrorist groups and is based on the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
		In her ruling, Collins said the order is unconstitutional because there is "no apparent limit" on presidential authority to designate groups or individuals as terrorists.
	www.informationclearinghouse.info /article15771.htm (654 words)

	Raleigh-Cary Jewish Federation
		Executive Order 13224 recognizes "the pervasiveness and expansiveness of the financial foundation of foreign terrorists" and regulates financial transactions that may end up in the hands of those that either commit or even "advocate" terrorism.
		Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, called for a congressional investigation of Ford Foundation grants to Palestinian NGOs.
		David Harris, executive director of AJCommittee, said it is "unfortunate" that Ford "is unwilling to go on the record, to explain or clarify its policy" regarding specific grantees.
	www.rcjf.org /articles/hate3.html (1812 words)

	Ambassador Williamson and Under Secretary Gurule: Transcript of Press Roundtable concerning Executive Order 13224 ...
		There are 147 countries that have issued blocking orders in support of the designations that have been made by the President.
		It does us very little good if we issue blocking orders in the United States with respect to domestic banks but terrorist financiers are able to move their money to foreign bank accounts.
		If OFAC then issues a blocking order and, again, if there is a challenge to that blocking order in the United States, even though, again, it's a derivative, if you will, following action that has been taken by a foreign country, as I stated, there's an administrative review process that can be pursued.
	www.usunnewyork.usmission.gov /02_016.htm (2605 words)

	Safeguard Properties
		U.S. persons who must comply with Executive Order 13224 include any U.S. citizen or permanent resident; any entity (which includes partnerships, associations, corporations, or other organizations, groups, or subgroups organized under the laws of the United States, as well as their foreign branches); or any other person who is in the United States.
		For this reason, we are reminding lenders of the importance of complying with the provisions of Executive Order 13224 in their selling and servicing activities.
		We encourage lenders who have any questions about the provisions of Executive Order 13224 (including the most judicious way of implementing them) to seek advice from their legal counsel.
	www.safeguardproperties.com /content/view/120/38 (1149 words)

	International Grantmaking Basics: Anti-terrorism Issues
		These included Executive Order 13224 and the USA Patriot Act, both issued shortly after 9/11, as well as the Treasury Department’s “Anti-Terrorist Financing Guidelines: Voluntary Best Practices for U.S.-Based Charities,” originally issued in November 2002 and most recently re-issued on September 29, 2006.
		Executive Order 13224 was signed by President George W. Bush on September 24, 2001, to cut off resources to terrorists and terrorist organizations through asset blocking.
		The Executive Order prohibits transactions with those entities deemed by the Executive Branch to be associated with terrorism and freezes all assets controlled by or in the possession of these entities and those who support them.
	www.usig.org /basics/anti-terrorism.asp (1218 words)

	Aid to Africa Federation - Eligibility
		This certification is required under the authority of Executive Order 13224 and OPM's plenary authority to administer the CFC, and is consistent with best practices recommended by the Department of the Treasury in its anti-terrorism guidance for U.S.-based charitable organizations.
		That publication calls for increased oversight of charities in order to identify and shut down those charities with ties to terrorist organizations and to keep terrorist financiers from using legitimate but unwitting charities for inappropriate purposes.
		Executive Order 13224 prohibits all persons, including non-profit entities, from contributing funds to or receiving services from terrorists, and does not include a safe harbor for unknowing acts.
	www.africacharities.org /opmmemo.shtml (1442 words)

	ArmsControlWonk: WMD Proliferation Financing Executive Order
		But the draft executive order goes far beyond previous measures by threatening the U.S. assets of individuals or companies, including foreign banks, that do business with those on the list.
		The President should expand the scope of Executive Order 13224 beyond terrorism to enable the Department of the Treasury to block the assets of persons and entities who provide financial support to proliferation.
		A full copy of Executive Order 13224 is available from the Treasury Department.
	www.armscontrolwonk.com /index.php?id=654 (565 words)

	Parts of Bush terror aid ban ruled unconstitutional / 'No apparent limit' on president's powers faulted by judge
		U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins, in a ruling released late Monday, found that two provisions of an executive order signed on Sept. 23, 2001, are impermissibly vague because they allow the president to unilaterally designate organizations as terrorist groups and broadly prohibit association with such groups.
		The latest case focuses on Executive Order 13224, which is aimed at cutting off financing to alleged terrorist groups and is based on a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
		In her ruling, Collins said the order was unconstitutional because there is "no apparent limit" on President Bush's authority to designate groups or individuals as terrorists.
	www.sfgate.com /cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/11/29/MNGPRMLJ6P1.DTL&feed=rss.news (475 words)

	Executive Order 13224 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Executive Order 13224 is an executive order signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush on September 23, 2001 as a response to the September 11, 2001 attacks.
		Executive Order 13224, from the U.S. Department of State website
		Executive Order on Terrorist Financing: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, White House, September 2001
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Executive_Order_13224 (138 words)

	Executive Order 13224—Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, ...
		Executive Order 13224—Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism - Transcript
		NOTE: This Executive order was released by the Office of the Press Secretary on September 24.
		This Executive order and the attached annex were published in the Federal Register on September 25.
	www.findarticles.com /p/articles/mi_m2889/is_39_37/ai_80013458/pg_3 (405 words)

	[No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-07-31)
		The Order expands the Treasury Department’s power to target the support structure of terrorist organizations by freezing the U.S. assets and blocking the U.S. transactions of terrorists and those that support them.
		The Order makes U.S. businesses responsible for monitoring their current interactions with investors, joint venturers, trading partners and customers.
		While these new requirements are important weapons in the war on terrorism, they create an additional burden for U.S. businesses to police their interactions with others, especially for those U.S. businesses with extensive dealings with individuals and/or entities from the geographical areas with high concentrations of terrorist groups.
	g.msn.com /9SE/1?http://www.attustech.com/resources/compliance.aspx?compid=8&&DI=6244&IG=6cd56309ac0e48cd8b6d0ad853c913c1&POS=8&CM=WPU&CE=8&CS=AWP&SR=8 (198 words)

	Shutting Down Terrorist Financial Networks
		Acting under the authority of Executive Order 13224, Blocking Terrorist Property, the Bush administration December 4 froze the assets of The Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, Beit Al-Mal Holdings and Al-Aqsa Islamic Bank.
		On November 2 of this year, it was added to the list of terrorist organizations subject to action under Executive Order 13224.
		The Order also established our ability to block the U.S. assets of, and deny access to U.S. markets to, those foreign banks that refuse to cooperate in freezing terrorist assets.
	www.usembassy.it /file2001_12/alia/a1120407.htm (1325 words)

	NASD - Rules & Regulation - Notice To Members 2001
		At midnight on September 24, 2001, President Bush issued Executive Order 13224 (Executive Order) freezing the property of and prohibiting transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism.
		The order was issued through the United States Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and the offices of the Secretaries of State and Treasury and the Attorney General determined the persons and organizations affected.
		The OFAC Web Site lists those persons and organizations affected by the Executive Order, as well as those persons, organizations, and countries that the Administration suspects are involved in terrorist activities.
	www.nasd.com /RulesRegulation/NoticestoMembers/2001NoticestoMembers/NASDW_003740 (186 words)

	Patriot Name Search and Information on the Patriot Act
		Effective September 24, 2001, President Bush issued Executive Order 13224, (as amended by Order 13268) which requires anyone conducting a financial transaction to determine if the person(s) with whom they are doing business are listed on the Blocked Persons List.
		Extends specified immigration-related deadlines and other filing requirements for an alien (and spouse and child) who was directly prevented from meeting such requirements as a result of the September attacks respecting: (1) nonimmigrant status and status revision; (2) diversity immigrants; (3) immigrant visas; (4) parolees; and (5) voluntary departure.
		Provides for: (1) continued family-sponsored immigrant eligibility for the spouse, child, or unmarried son or daughter of a permanent resident who died as a direct result of such attacks; and (2) continued eligibility for adjustment of status for the spouse and child of an employment-based immigrant who died similarly.
	www.charlesjones.com /Patriotnamesearch.htm (6957 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)