| |
| | Filesystems (ext3, reiser, xfs, jfs) comparison on Debian Etch |
 | | Interestingly, the residual capacity of Ext3 and ReiserFS was identical to the initial, while JFS and XFS lost about 0.02% of their partition capacity, suggesting that these FS can dynamically grow but do not completely return to their inital state (and size) after file removal. |
 | | My experience is that 'ext3' requires at least 10% free space to perform decently over time (the 5% default is the absolute minimum that should be done) and 20-30% free space reserve is a lot better. |
 | | I compared the ext3 "tuned" modes, and found ext3 with dir_index, and dir_index with data=writeback or data=journal improved most tests, in some cases where directories were involved, remarkably. |
| www.debian-administration.org /articles/388 (10318 words) |
|