| | The Seattle Times: Nation & World: Filibuster precedent in '68, Democrats say |
 | | WASHINGTON 8212; The Senate was launched on a full-blown filibuster, with one South Carolina senator consuming time by reading "long passages of James F. Byrnes' memoirs in a thick Southern accent," according to a newspaper account. |
 | | A New York Times story that day said Fortas' opponents "began a historic filibuster today." As the debate dragged on for four days, news accounts consistently described it as a full-blown filibuster intended to prevent Fortas' confirmation from reaching the floor, where a simple-majority vote would have decided the question. |
 | | Current GOP leaders sometimes amend their comments, saying the Fortas battle is not a precedent for today's filibusters because Fortas faced so much opposition that his confirmation would have failed on a simple yes-no vote. |
| seattletimes.nwsource.com /html/nationworld/2002213725_judges20.html (870 words) |