| | Library Letter re: Sections 414 & 417 (First Sale Doctrine) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-04) |
 | | By modifying the First Sale Doctrine, however, this second wholly undebated provision also may undermine the present legal basis of inter-library and patron lending of copyrighted materials. |
 | | At the very least such a change should not occur without detailed analysis of its impact, public debate to bring it to the attention of potentially affected constituencies, and careful consideration of whether this is the best way to achieve the goals of Congress on this issue, whatever they may be. |
 | | It appeared for the first time as part of the final version of H.R. 2281 submitted to the House for action on the suspension calendar, and even on that occasion no reference was made to it in any of the floor statements of the legislation's sponsors. We urge you to reject this controversial provision. |
| www.arl.org /info/letters/firstsale.html (858 words) |