| |
| | Talk History Forum - Five good Emperors of Rome. (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-07) |
 | | Marcus Aurelius also was good, but he had bad luck and the barbars encouraged to cross the limes, there was a epidemy, and finally he left the Throne to his son Commodo (no, he never did anything to restaure the Republic, forget Gladiator). |
 | | Because this threads refers only to the five emperors that were called "the good Emperors", and they are only the five that appear in the poll. |
 | | Actually other Emperors, as Augustus or Vespasian, were considered better Emperors than, for example, Nerva or Antoninus Pius, but this five came together, and during their reign the prosperity of the Empire reached its hedge, contrasting with the decay after Marcus Aurelius. |
| www.talk-history.com /forum/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=1323 (561 words) |
|